To: cutepanda
In fairness, Lincoln Chafee does increase the Republican margin in the Senate if nothing else. He's otherwise worthless of course.
3 posted on
09/17/2006 6:02:26 PM PDT by
Menehune56
(Oderint Dum Metuant (Let them hate, so long as they fear - Lucius Accius (170 BC - 86 BC)))
To: Menehune56
I geuss apparently both dems and rep's agree that if Chafee wins that race then the dems have no chance to win the senate.
9 posted on
09/17/2006 6:04:44 PM PDT by
fkabuckeyesrule
(They shot Brian Piccalo on Vegas Tonight!!!!!!)
To: Menehune56
"He's otherwise worthless of course."Far worse than worthless, actually. This is the RINO A-hole who has personally blocked John Bolton's confirmation as our UN ambassador.
18 posted on
09/17/2006 6:12:48 PM PDT by
Czar
( StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
To: Menehune56
In fairness, Lincoln Chafee does increase the Republican margin in the Senate if nothing else. He's otherwise worthless of course. Same thing with Tom Kean Jr. He is a RINO but it is another person on our side of the aisle.
22 posted on
09/17/2006 6:18:20 PM PDT by
mware
(Americans in armchairs doing the job of the media.)
To: Menehune56
In fairness, Lincoln Chafee does increase the Republican margin in the Senate if nothing else. He's otherwise worthless of course. Only if the Senate would have exactly 49 Republicans outside Chaffee's seat would control of the Senate be affected by whether Chaffee or Whitehouse wins. Given that there's no guarantee that a win by Chaffee would secure the Senate even in that case (since he might well pull a Jeffords) I see no reason why the GOP should spend money on him that could be more usefully spent elsewhere.
Of course, I have my own suspicions about what's really behind the GOP's endorsement of Chaffee, but that's another story.
37 posted on
09/17/2006 6:36:29 PM PDT by
supercat
(Sony delenda est.)
To: Menehune56
"In fairness, Lincoln Chafee does increase the Republican margin in the Senate if nothing else. He's otherwise worthless of course."
The net effect of which is to allow a Republican Senate to do all the things a Democratic Senate would do, and leave Conservatives with no where to go within the existing parties. Chafee chafes me.
39 posted on
09/17/2006 6:38:47 PM PDT by
Humble Servant
(Keep it simple - do what's right.)
To: Menehune56
But wouldn't we really win, in the end, if Chaffee lost and Harris won? Unless I'm really offbase, I believe she would not be a RINO like Chaffee.
To: Menehune56
In fairness, Lincoln Chafee does increase the Republican margin in the Senate if nothing else. He'd have to vote Republican to be of any use.
48 posted on
09/17/2006 6:54:46 PM PDT by
Doctor Raoul
(New York Times? Get a rope!)
To: Menehune56
In fairness, Lincoln Chafee does increase the Republican margin in the Senate if nothing else. He's otherwise worthless of course.
You are absolutely right. His only worth is being a place holder. The #1 issue this election year is keeping the RATS out.
161 posted on
09/18/2006 8:54:45 AM PDT by
wjcsux
(Proudly displaying my contempt for X 42.)
To: Menehune56
If Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island is replaced by Katherine Harris of Florida, the balance remains unchanged.
And two states get a much more true representation of their respective political philosophies.
162 posted on
09/18/2006 8:58:31 AM PDT by
alloysteel
(Moderate Islam is for those who still believe in the Tooth Fairy.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson