Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mjolnir

see my post #16, and the page referenced.


18 posted on 09/18/2006 5:22:05 PM PDT by cinives (On some planets what I do is considered normal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: cinives
see my post #16, and the page referenced.

Thanks, good link!

I think that page doesn't really show that Benedict was misleading, though... The Pope's point was that the Catholic Church historically supported science, not that it was always correct in the science it supported.

I do think the Learned Emperor the Pope quoted was correct about Islam as well, and the American conservative thinker Richard Weaver ("Ideas have Consequences") was wrong when he said that nominalism and positivism made for scientific advancement. The acceptance by historical Islam of a God who transcends reason, goodness and all other categories we can imagine rather than (the traditional Judeo-Christian) God who is the source of such things is one who has no use for laws of morality or laws of nature.

We are dealing what seem to me to be at least in large part the consequences of that belief today.
24 posted on 09/18/2006 5:50:49 PM PDT by mjolnir ("All great change in America begins at the dinner table.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson