To: tomzz
I love these ships, and what they represent. But its not true that it would take a nuclear weapon to sink one. HMS Royal Oak and HMS Barham. The General Belgrano was not a battleship, but Argentina would have been better off without it.
We are better off with dispersed assets in these days. A lot of eggs in a lot of baskets, rather than a lot of eggs in one big basket.
33 posted on
09/18/2006 8:27:49 PM PDT by
Arkinsaw
To: Arkinsaw
"he General Belgrano was not a battleship,"
I believe the Belgrano was aluminum, or was that the British ship?
To: Arkinsaw
ROYAL OAK and BARHAM were WW I era BBs. For comparison, try the BISMARCK. When James Cameron did his special on it a couple of years back, he was able to get a miniature sub/camera into the outer hull. None of the DORSETSHIRE's torpedoes [and she fired at least four at a then stationary target], penetrated the armor belt and outer hull.
96 posted on
09/18/2006 10:20:15 PM PDT by
PzLdr
("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson