Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: XR7

this would simply accelerate the de-industrialization of the US. when there are no more "polluters" to tax, what's Gore going to do next?


2 posted on 09/18/2006 8:00:53 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: oceanview

Tax carbon dioxide emissions - every time you exhale, you get taxed!


3 posted on 09/18/2006 8:02:55 PM PDT by RebelBanker (We must not and cannot let the perfect be the enemy of the good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: oceanview



No more eating beans. Gore wants to tax pooters.


5 posted on 09/18/2006 8:04:42 PM PDT by Go Gordon (I don't know what your problem is, but I bet its hard to pronounce)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: oceanview
We need to tax Gore's mouth.
11 posted on 09/18/2006 8:11:06 PM PDT by CAWats (Post to Free Republic without knowing HTML. Click my name.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: oceanview
this would simply accelerate the de-industrialization of the US. Correct. The Goron will just transfer the "pollution" and production to China, India and Mexico.

One more thing, If they are taxing Carbon Dioxide, anyone with a light truck or SUV or any transportation business would be hit hard with the tax. For that matter all vehicles produce C02, so anything with an internal combustion engine would be subject to it. We might have to get used to Public Transportation or riding bicycles. If Gore exempts consumers from his proposal, then he would probably pass the tax on to manufacturers who would just pass the additional cost to the consumer or like I said, move the manufacturing elsewhere.
26 posted on 09/18/2006 8:20:21 PM PDT by lmr (The answers to life don't involve complex solutions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: oceanview

Unlikely.

What it WOULD do, however, is simply force management to either A. Fire workers, B. Cut sallaries, C. If B is impossible because of contracts, simply suspend the next pay raise/bonus. or D. Hire less workers.

Bottom line: Those 'payrolls' he wants to protect so badly still take the hit.

I'm not saying there isn't a time and place to tax pollutants, but pretending there is a difference between taxing the company and taxing the 'average' folks who work at the plant is just flat-out fantasy.


67 posted on 09/19/2006 12:57:02 AM PDT by zbigreddogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson