Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California Faces Uphill Battle On Car Emissions (Lawsuit)
New Scientist ^ | 9-22-2006 | Roxanne Khamsi

Posted on 09/22/2006 10:09:23 AM PDT by blam

California faces uphill battle on car emissions

11:12 22 September 2006
NewScientist.com news service
Roxanne Khamsi

California is unlikely to win its lawsuit against six of the world’s largest car manufacturers, which it filed earlier this week, say legal experts. The state is suing the automakers for the costs it says are associated with the vehicles’ greenhouse gas emissions.

Even with a small chance of success, environmental advocates say the new legal action is useful and necessary because of threats to the state’s existing plans to reduce car emissions.

The government of California has made many headlines by promoting laws to curb greenhouse gas emissions, even as the Bush administration rejects similar steps at national level. In August 2006 the state legislature passed a bill, which Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger is expected to sign, that will regulate such emissions produced by general industry.

The lawsuit filed this week by California's attorney general Bill Lockyer targets General Motors, Ford, Chrysler, and subsidiaries of Honda, Toyota and Nissan. Lokyer says the car manufacturers are responsible for 30% of state’s greenhouse gas emissions.

The complaint argues that the state has spent large amounts of money dealing with the impact of car emissions, including “planning, monitoring and infrastructure changes” to address problems such as increased ozone pollution, rising sea levels and an increased threat of wildfires.

Lockyer, who is up for election in early November for the position of state treasurer, has estimated the current damages at “tens of millions of dollars”.

Connecting evidence However, the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers – a Washington DC-based trade group that represents carmakers – denied that the companies are to blame. “Automakers are already building cleaner, more fuel-efficient vehicles, and every single auto sold in California is approved by the State of California before it goes...

(Excerpt) Read more at newscientist.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: battle; california; car; emissions; faces; lawsuit; uphill

1 posted on 09/22/2006 10:09:24 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam

The car companies should counter sue. IMO


2 posted on 09/22/2006 10:19:45 AM PDT by HEY4QDEMS (Sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

I wonder if the state's attorneys will all ride bikes to the courthouse, somehow I doubt it.


3 posted on 09/22/2006 10:25:42 AM PDT by Abathar (Proudly catching hell for posting without reading the article since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam


Rising sea levels? ROFL.

Wildfires? Due to smog?


4 posted on 09/22/2006 10:26:58 AM PDT by Malsua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Frivolous lawsuit, IMO.
5 posted on 09/22/2006 10:30:20 AM PDT by BenLurkin ("The entire remedy is with the people." - W. H. Harrison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
threats to the state’s existing plans to reduce car emissions.

Simply ban the use of the internal combustion engine within the state. Problem solved.
6 posted on 09/22/2006 10:33:45 AM PDT by P-40 (Al Qaeda was working in Iraq. They were just undocumented.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Governments should never win political assults on its legal private companies.

Sadly, like the smoking lawsuits where the lawyers made billions of dollars for their support of politicans, the California AG is providing years of revenue to the lawyers that support the government and his campaign.

Our AG is a lowlife.


7 posted on 09/22/2006 10:39:20 AM PDT by edcoil (Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
This has got to be the most ridicuolous waste of the taxpayer's money I've ever heard of.

8 posted on 09/22/2006 10:43:39 AM PDT by Clifford The Big Red Dog (Woof!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P-40
"Simply ban the use of the internal combustion engine within the state. Problem solved."

ALGORE! Is that you???

9 posted on 09/22/2006 10:45:25 AM PDT by SierraWasp (With government as your savior from disaster, it must first be your master!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: HEY4QDEMS

The car companies should join the state as a codefendant. After all, Caltans built all those freeways without which there would be much less in the way of CO2 emissions. Better yet, join the Governator as a codefendant. He actually believes all this greenhouse stuff and he still owns and uses comparatively inefficeint cars.


10 posted on 09/22/2006 10:47:17 AM PDT by p. henry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blam

Those companies being sued should IMMEDIATLY stop selling cars in Mexifornia.
For decades the CA. emmisions have been the strictest in the nation. ALL the companies met or exceeded those standards. Now Lockyer wants to say too bad!
That is like seeing the speed limit at 60 mph, you are driving at 59 mph and the cop says "oh well, we just want you to pay".
This suit will never get to trial.


11 posted on 09/22/2006 10:48:37 AM PDT by hophead ("Enjoy Every Sandwich")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
......Lokyer says the car manufacturers are responsible for 30% of state’s greenhouse gas emissions.

And the other 60% is from all the BS spewed by the envirowacko's.

12 posted on 09/22/2006 10:55:11 AM PDT by Fiddlstix (Warning! This Is A Subliminal Tagline! Read it at your own risk!(Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

I think this "lawsuit" is merely a ploy to get the car companies to drop their own lawsuits against new emissions standards.


13 posted on 09/22/2006 10:57:58 AM PDT by A Balrog of Morgoth (With fire, sword, and stinging whip I drive the RINOs in terror before me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HEY4QDEMS

No, they should simply cease all operations in the state of California as soon as possible.


14 posted on 09/22/2006 10:59:23 AM PDT by BeHoldAPaleHorse ( ~()):~)>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blam

"environmental advocates say the new legal action is useful and necessary because of threats to the state’s existing plans to reduce car emissions."

Typical liberal crap, their "existing plans" are nothing more than demands placed on the producers. When the state of California gets in the auto business, they can plan to reduce the emissions in the cars they produce.


15 posted on 09/22/2006 11:05:00 AM PDT by CSM ("When you stop lying about us, we'll stop telling the truth about you." No Truce With Kings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HEY4QDEMS

I think all 6 carmakers should add a "Surcharge for Defense from Goofy California Lawsuits" to the "sticker-price" of each car sold in California.

This might lead some angry California citizens to buy their automobiles in Nevada or Arizona. I could live with that...


16 posted on 09/22/2006 11:08:47 AM PDT by pfony1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blam

what about Porshe,Jaguar,Mercedes,Rolls Royce,Bentley,Lexus,Ferrari,Maserati,Lamborghini,etc.? Plenty of those in California


17 posted on 09/22/2006 11:15:24 AM PDT by shooter223 (the government should fear the citizens......not the other way around)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shooter223

YOU CAN'T OFFEND THOSE PEOPLE!!! They're limosine liberals!!!


18 posted on 09/22/2006 11:57:36 AM PDT by SierraWasp (With government as your savior from disaster, it must first be your master!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson