Now I
really don't trust Pakistan.
Regards, Ivan
1 posted on
09/25/2006 12:55:57 AM PDT by
MadIvan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
To: DCPatriot; Deetes; Barset; fanfan; LadyofShalott; Tolik; mtngrl@vrwc; pax_et_bonum; Alkhin; ...
2 posted on
09/25/2006 12:57:10 AM PDT by
MadIvan
(I aim to misbehave.)
To: MadIvan
PRESIDENT Musharraf of Pakistan says that the CIA has secretly paid his government millions of dollars for handing over hundreds of al-Qaeda suspects to America.Works for me!
3 posted on
09/25/2006 1:01:36 AM PDT by
SuziQ
To: sukhoi-30mki
And the cows have started to come home...
Good times are going to roll for India, I guess.
4 posted on
09/25/2006 1:01:48 AM PDT by
CarrotAndStick
(The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
To: MadIvan
Thanks for the ping, Ivan.
This caught my eye:
"The latest revelation will embarrass the White House days before General Musharraf is due to meet President Bush and President Karzai of Afghanistan to discuss how to combat a resurgent Taleban."
I just find it hard to believe, it doesn't make sense. I think he's playing to his base. Before deciding about it, I'd like some proof other than his say-so.
5 posted on
09/25/2006 1:02:48 AM PDT by
Judith Anne
(Thank you St. Jude for favors granted.)
To: MadIvan
Yuppers, they're playing both sides while they prep to instigate India once again. Don't trust 'em one bit!
BTW good to see yunz again MI! ALWAYS enjoy your posts!
prisoner6
6 posted on
09/25/2006 1:59:40 AM PDT by
prisoner6
(Right Wing Nuts hold the country together as the loose screws of the Left fall out.)
To: MadIvan
Nor do I. Many people say many things--especially when they are not accountable to back up the rhetoric. I wonder if bombing them would have been less expensive... Nonetheless, I am grateful for the information extracted from these terrorists whether bought by another government or with water boarding.
7 posted on
09/25/2006 2:01:34 AM PDT by
Ruth A.
(we might as well fight in the first ditch as the last)
To: MadIvan
General Musharraf says that he decided to disclose details of covert operations and his countrys capture of 689 suspects since 9/11 to counter claims that Pakistan has not done enough to combat al-Qaeda.
During the same period of time our intelligence agencies claim up to 60,000 additional al Qaeda fighters and terrorists have been trained in Pakistan. That's nearly a thousand to one replacement ratio. Pakistan is doing a lot in the WOT. It's just a question for which side of the WOT.
To: MadIvan
Times is running this as a Get Bush piece, but it sounds like taxation to me. US pays individual Pakistanis X millions. Pakistani government takes its cut. Presidents, prison guards, soldiers and policemen are individuals too.
9 posted on
09/25/2006 2:14:48 AM PDT by
JohnCliftn
(In War: Resolution. In Defeat: Defiance. In Victory: Magnanimity. In Peace: Good Will. - Churchill)
To: MadIvan
Finally, my tax dollars being put to proper use!
10 posted on
09/25/2006 2:42:07 AM PDT by
carton253
(Al-Qa'eda are not the Viet Cong. If you exit, they'll follow. And Americans will die...)
To: MadIvan
"The US government has strict rules banning such reward payments to foreign powers involved in the war on terror."
And what fool made that policy (if true)???
Putting a price on terrorist's heads and rewarding those who capture them is not a bad thing!
11 posted on
09/25/2006 2:51:03 AM PDT by
DB
(©)
To: MadIvan
Now I really don't trust Pakistan.I never did. They're playing on both sides.
12 posted on
09/25/2006 2:59:33 AM PDT by
Sarajevo
(AAAh! Baghdad-dust, heat, more heat and more dust. I wish I had a beer. Allegra! Pass the beer.)
To: MadIvan
Now I really don't trust Pakistan.I never did. They're playing on both sides.
13 posted on
09/25/2006 3:00:07 AM PDT by
Sarajevo
(AAAh! Baghdad-dust, heat, more heat and more dust. I wish I had a beer.)
To: MadIvan
The US Department of Justice said: "These bounty payments are for private individuals who help to trace terrorists, not foreign governments. The US government has strict rules."
The Iran-Iraq War would never have occurred had Jimmy Carter not withdrew U.S. support for the Shah of Iran and ordered the CIA to stop paying millions of dollars per year in bribes to the Mullahs who disliked the Shah.
This unleashed the Mullahs fury and the Shah was toppled.
14 posted on
09/25/2006 3:29:47 AM PDT by
anglian
To: MadIvan
Like Mushareff is saying anything that should surprise anyone. We were attacked, I'd be shocked if we didn't do everything to grab the bastards.
To: MadIvan
Not having read the book I would assume that Mushareff is merely trying to cover his rear end.
None of this sensational confessional changes the fact that the terrorists were turned over to our country.
Better to pay cash than expend the lives of our troops hunting these scum.
16 posted on
09/25/2006 3:56:47 AM PDT by
OldFriend
(I Pledge Allegiance to the Flag.....and My Heart to the Soldier Who Protects It.)
To: MadIvan
Ever since we started our War on Terror, we have offered money for the capture of leading terrorists. Throughout the war in Afghanistan, we had to pay off each tribe as we or the tribes on our side encountered them. There was more buying off tribes than fighting in Afghanistan. At no time did Pakistan ever offer to help us for free with no strings attached, and as a matter of fact if Musharraf ever felt threatened by anyone from the Bush administration to become our ally, he should have felt threatened the night of 9/11 during President Bush's address to the world when Bush laid down the difference between who our allies and enemies were.
Musharraf is trying to sell his new book and thinks by leaking information like this is, the sales of his book will increase. Maybe he's right, the MSM is playing right into his hands by treating old news like startling revelations.
17 posted on
09/25/2006 4:01:41 AM PDT by
Dixie Yooper
(Ephesians 6:11)
To: MadIvan
So what he's saying is that Pakistan won't do anything with al-Qaeda unless we pay them.
20 posted on
09/25/2006 4:23:47 AM PDT by
caver
(Yes, I did crawl out of a hole in the ground.)
To: MadIvan
And this is a bad thing, because?
Any way we get them.
Why libs want to waste tears on illegal combatants -- pirates and filibusters -- is beyond me.
21 posted on
09/25/2006 4:24:32 AM PDT by
No Truce With Kings
(The opinions expressed are mine! Mine! MINE! All Mine!)
To: MadIvan
I don't think we could ever trust Pakistan unless we had a loaded gun pointing at them, with no chance for escape.
It seems pretty obvious that Pakistan has been an unwilling "ally" in the War on Terror, but considering the population I'm not sure we could expect much more without removing Mushy from power, and installing a US-approved leader. Bush should be credited for playing hardball with Pakistan and getting them to cooperate as much as they have IMHO.
And I don't understand why I should care if we paid for some prisoners.
22 posted on
09/25/2006 4:44:29 AM PDT by
RobFromGa
(The FairTax cult is like Scientology, but without the movie stars)
To: MadIvan
Remember, they have nukes! The world is going to be really something if Iran gets nukes!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson