To: A Citizen Reporter
Now, Bill Kristol joins the chorus, saying that clinton did this purposefully in order to "intimidate" other journalists from asking any questions. Give me a break, Kristol. I think there could be some truth in that. Not that Clinturd isn't a thug with a short fuse but there could be an attempt to intimidate against questions he doesn't want to answer.
And which he never really did answer directly, of course.
271 posted on
09/25/2006 6:16:00 AM PDT by
prairiebreeze
(No religion demands so much of it's members and so little of itself, than islam.)
To: prairiebreeze
Anybody who looks to put a "purpose" on this absolute red-hot rage that exploded out of clinton I will look upon suspiciously.
It's simply trying to spin history, the way the clinton apologists always do.
To: prairiebreeze
Actually, Kristol might be on the right track.
Hillary is having a debate in my old hometown on October 20th. We know that Hillary MUST HAVE the questions pre-debate. It's always been that way. Look for this demand to be in all future interviews.
Her plantation remark, Gas station remark or F'n Jew remark are vestiges of "off the cuff" speeches.
298 posted on
09/25/2006 6:24:51 AM PDT by
Sacajaweau
(God Bless Our Troops!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson