Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: A Citizen Reporter
Now, Bill Kristol joins the chorus, saying that clinton did this purposefully in order to "intimidate" other journalists from asking any questions. Give me a break, Kristol.

I think there could be some truth in that. Not that Clinturd isn't a thug with a short fuse but there could be an attempt to intimidate against questions he doesn't want to answer.

And which he never really did answer directly, of course.

271 posted on 09/25/2006 6:16:00 AM PDT by prairiebreeze (No religion demands so much of it's members and so little of itself, than islam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies ]


To: prairiebreeze
Anybody who looks to put a "purpose" on this absolute red-hot rage that exploded out of clinton I will look upon suspiciously.

It's simply trying to spin history, the way the clinton apologists always do.

276 posted on 09/25/2006 6:18:04 AM PDT by A Citizen Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies ]

To: prairiebreeze
Actually, Kristol might be on the right track.

Hillary is having a debate in my old hometown on October 20th. We know that Hillary MUST HAVE the questions pre-debate. It's always been that way. Look for this demand to be in all future interviews.

Her plantation remark, Gas station remark or F'n Jew remark are vestiges of "off the cuff" speeches.

298 posted on 09/25/2006 6:24:51 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson