Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gail Wynand
I am "stuck" as you call it, on the hard, cold, facts.

Talk of repeating one's self....go look into the nearest mirror. You repeat the same erroneous claptrap, over and over and over again, without given a single example. P;ease name every other governor's wife who engaged in this sort of thing, who was caught, tried, convicted, and sent to jail. Of course, since there are none, you can't give any. Okay, no governor's wives, so how about wives of mayors, Senators, V.P.'s, alderman's?

I post facts, you post from your imagination.

67 posted on 09/26/2006 8:00:39 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]


To: nopardons

the first refuge of the intellectually dishonest is to try and change the subject.

you have not shown a single reason Mrs. Clinton could not have been prosecuted.

You have expressed your opinion that since no one else other than the broker was prosecuted, and your opinion that since you dont have a written order from Hillary directing the fraud, that she could not be. This is simply not true.

As I pointed out for you three times, it is quite common to prosecute fraud and bribery crimes by indirect evidence, which is in ABUNDANCE in the cattle futures case.

Go ahead, ignore the obvious and repeat yourself again.


68 posted on 09/26/2006 9:09:14 PM PDT by Gail Wynand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson