Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Shimmer128

If their testimony is accurate then I see no problems with them absolutely slamming and damning the administration if warranted.

You wouldn't expect them to stay silent and hide the truth if they were under h. clinton, would you?


19 posted on 09/25/2006 5:51:57 AM PDT by Eagle Eye (There ought to be a law against excess legislation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: Eagle Eye

Criminal behavior, no, I wouldn't. But personal opinions, yes, I do believe they are supposed to keep out of it.


22 posted on 09/25/2006 5:54:42 AM PDT by Shimmer128 (Ku'uipo, me ke aloha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Eagle Eye

I understand them "speaking out" but from this article it is hard to nail down anything specific beyond a few vague comments out of context. Imagine Gates speaking out about Washington, Patton speaking out about Eisenhours, McClellan speaking out against Lincoln, MacArthur speaking about against Truman...wait a minute, this probably happened. Generals are all politicians. Once they are retired what else do they have to do but try and get elected? This makes them easy targets. Old soldiers at that rank rarely "fade away".


29 posted on 09/25/2006 5:59:33 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Eagle Eye
There is nothing so useless for tactical and strategic advise as a retired general. They are obsolescent the week after they retire.
99 posted on 09/25/2006 1:13:01 PM PDT by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson