Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tobyhill
He just admitted that he would leave our troops in harms way because there would be no money for munitions much less for evacuation when they can't defend themselves. They would then be sitting ducks.

Supplemental funding for the war isn't the same as the military budget. Even if all of the extra money disappeared, they'd still have resources to leave, albiet in a way that a Marine in the Korean war once described as "Advancing in the other direction".

It would by far be the most embarassing and televised retreat in American military history. You'd never get a majority of Dems to vote on a cut like that, even if some of them secretly want it, to prove a point.

40 posted on 09/26/2006 7:23:04 AM PDT by Steel Wolf (As Ibn Warraq said, "There are moderate Muslims but there is no moderate Islam.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Steel Wolf
If it wasn't for the supplemental funding then the military would have to rob Peter to pay Paul and that would leave vulnerabilities elsewhere.
54 posted on 09/26/2006 7:35:26 AM PDT by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson