Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: windchime
But Osama Bin Laden already declared war on the USA in 1996.
He already was performing terrorist acts on the United States.
Knowing that a couple of countries at different times offered to give him to Bill Clinton.

What mileage does even a sociopath President get out of leaving this terrorist loose?

I think he didn't care, but don't think a plan to not take him on purpose would be possible.
51 posted on 09/26/2006 10:48:38 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: A CA Guy

In the Wallace interview, Clinton used the word 'kill' many times. Reports I've heard/read indicate he was concerned about killing him because of the prohibition on assassination.

So, he wouldn't take him on a silver platter and wouldn't kill him. Osama on the loose is the only other option. I have no idea why.


66 posted on 09/26/2006 11:26:32 PM PDT by windchime (One war~many fronts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson