Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
To: SirLinksalot
Uh oh. An evolution thread. We know what this means.
Dun dun dun, dun dun-dun, dun dun dun, dun dun-dun, dun dun dun, dun dun-dun
MORTAL KOMBAT!
To: SirLinksalot
These creationist goons make thinking conservatives look bad.
If anyone does not believe in Darwinism, i'll take them on a tour in the Museum of Natural History and explain it.
4 posted on
09/27/2006 10:01:32 AM PDT by
finnman69
(cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestu s globus, inflammare animos)
To: PatrickHenry
Breathtaking simple-mindedness ping.
5 posted on
09/27/2006 10:02:23 AM PDT by
Physicist
To: PatrickHenry
"Evolution is doomed" ping
6 posted on
09/27/2006 10:02:24 AM PDT by
indcons
To: SirLinksalot
8 posted on
09/27/2006 10:03:28 AM PDT by
balch3
To: SirLinksalot
"Darwinism teaches that we are accidental byproducts of purposeless natural processes that had no need for God,..."
"Darwinism" teaches nothing of the sort. Evolution is an explanation of, to be brief, how we got here. It describes a theorized mechanism, one which is perfectly compatible with Christianity.
10 posted on
09/27/2006 10:05:29 AM PDT by
Buck W.
(If you push something hard enough, it will fall over.)
To: editor-surveyor
Thread not starting out in Smoky Backroom placemarker : )
To: SirLinksalot
OHHH JESUSTH CHRISTH! JESUSTH CHRISTH!
12 posted on
09/27/2006 10:06:09 AM PDT by
Al Simmons
(I am sorely AFFECTED by the social EFFECT of people's confusion over these two simple words..)
To: SirLinksalot
Berkeley biology and Yale theology. God help us.
At least he's not an ethicist.
14 posted on
09/27/2006 10:06:38 AM PDT by
NicknamedBob
(If the "enemy of your enemy" is Ghengis Khan, Ghengis Khan is not your friend.)
To: SirLinksalot
Moonbats on both sides, I see. Oh well, I can live with ours.
17 posted on
09/27/2006 10:07:44 AM PDT by
Paradox
(American Conservatives: Keeping the world safe for Liberalism.)
To: SirLinksalot
Evolution and Faith are neither enemies nor mutually exclusive - they are different discliplines addressing different aspects of human existence and thought.
'Flat-earth', er... 'Young-earth' Creationists are (in my opinion) fools who are either too daft to understand the principle of evidence gathering and logical analysis, or who have willfully chosen to ignore scientific evidence owing usually to acceptance at an early age of a clearly erroneous, rote religious dogma.
18 posted on
09/27/2006 10:07:59 AM PDT by
Al Simmons
(Holocaust deniers and other anti-semites are the lowest form of human scum.)
To: SirLinksalot
The truth is Darwinism is not a scientific theory, but a materialistic creation myth masquerading as science. It is first and foremost a weapon against religion especially traditional Christianity. It's interesting to see someone with a PhD in Biology take this approach.
19 posted on
09/27/2006 10:09:06 AM PDT by
ClearCase_guy
(The broken wall, the burning roof and tower. And Agamemnon dead.)
To: SirLinksalot
If I were a Darwinist, I would be afraid. Very afraid. If I was silly enough to believe this article, I would be afraid, very afraid.
20 posted on
09/27/2006 10:09:25 AM PDT by
Coyoteman
(I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
To: Right Wing Professor; DoctorMichael; sinkspur; bornacatholic; VadeRetro; ahayes; ...
OK. You asked for a fight? I'll GIVE you a fight!!!
*CREVO FLYING BRICKBAT PING!!
28 posted on
09/27/2006 10:16:13 AM PDT by
Al Simmons
(Holocaust deniers and other anti-semites are the lowest form of human scum.)
To: SirLinksalot
So after 150 years, Darwinists are still looking for evidence any evidence, no matter how skimpy to justify their speculations. Actually, they're not. They're trying to nail down the difficult relationships using the new genetic tools. As in, how many phyla of animals are there?
That's what makes the creationists' story line so difficult to maintain. Facts just aren't relevant to creationists. They'll still be writing this story 100 years from now, 1000 years from now, and 10,000 years from now.
After that, no one will remember what the argument was about.
To: SirLinksalot
Darwinism teaches that we are accidental byproducts of purposeless natural processes that had no need for God Here we go again... :( The earth is at the center of the universe. Spontaneous generation creates rats. Anyone who disagrees with these things is a liberal atheist. Why science itself is liberal! Let's just abandon all science, live in huts, and ignore any challenge to our orthodoxy.
Good heavens, it's 2006, and we're still debating if evolution is real. Sad but true. And for the record, I am a staunch Christian.
To: SirLinksalot
[Sun Myung Moon]'s words, my studies, and my prayers convinced me that I should devote my life to destroying Darwinism -- Jonathan Wells
45 posted on
09/27/2006 10:23:50 AM PDT by
Liberal Classic
(No better friend, no worse enemy. Semper Fi.)
To: SirLinksalot
[ Why Darwinism Is Doomed ]
That WON'T happen until Jesus comes back really really pissed off..
Its THEN the dialectic backstroke will start..
47 posted on
09/27/2006 10:24:52 AM PDT by
hosepipe
(CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole.)
To: SirLinksalot
The truth is Darwinism is not a scientific theory, but a materialistic creation myth masquerading as science. It is first and foremost a weapon against religion especially traditional Christianity. Evidence is brought in afterwards, as window dressing. And there you have it. Darwin was not a scientist, but an atheist bent on the destruction of all religion masquerading as a scientist.
49 posted on
09/27/2006 10:25:07 AM PDT by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: George W. Bush
Not sure if this topic is of interest to you, but with your natural, *AHEM*, cantankerousness, I am certain you could make a contribution to this developing donnybrook!!
50 posted on
09/27/2006 10:25:08 AM PDT by
Al Simmons
(Personal Relationship w/God = Mind Control technique designed in part to block critical thought)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson