Darwinism teaches that we are accidental byproducts of purposeless natural processes that had no need for God, and this anti-religious dogma enjoys a taxpayer-funded monopoly in America's public schools and universities.
Is this the usual and customary way to start a scholarly Discussion of a science topic?
What do you claim is invalid or "un-shcolarly" about the statement and was it scholarly for you to retort with ONLY a person attack (with a helping of mind-reading)
Are you big on the "monkey see, monkey do" philosophy of life?