The actual fgure is something like 99.8% of biologists, paleontologists, geneticists etc. In other words, 998 out of a thousnad professionals accept evo, 2 don't.
You said: The actual fgure is something like 99.8% of biologists, paleontologists, geneticists etc. In other words, 998 out of a thousnad professionals accept evo, 2 don't.
The article said:
"The issue here is not "evolution" – a broad term that can mean simply change within existing species (which no one doubts)."
IOW, the article was wrong when it said "which no one doubts" Apparently at least two guys do. ;)
This is not true: I can name many noted scientists who do
not accept Darwinism.