No, demonstrably bad design shows that the hypothetical designer is not a good engineer. If human intelligence is able to say that some designs are evidence of intelligence, then that same human intelligence can say that they're evidence of incomepetence.
Because man (woman) cannot explain these seemingly bizare structures, then God cannot exist
Huh? No, it just shows that if these structures were designed, the designer was not a good engineer. It's evidence against the "intelligent" part of ID.
Still doesn't exactly provide any direct evidence of evolution, though, does it?
Are you paying attention? Did you read any of the web site I linked to? It is specifically showing evidence against ID, not evidence for ToE.
So, what's your take on the recurrent laryngeal nerve? The marsupian egg teeth? The platypus teeth that never erupt?
The claim is that the design of living things shows evidence of intelligence. This is showing that some of these designs show signs of stupidity.
You are jumping to a lot of conclusions!
The details are left as a proof to the interested lurkers on the thread.
Cheers!