VIRTUAL KILL: The Chris Wallace-bill clinton Interview Deconstructed

FoxNews, CBS | 9.29.06 | Mia T

[Mia T]

I don't follow you.

[Mia T]

thank you, PGalt. :)

[jla]

You stated: "if I could have my way I would purge DC of all professional pols and replace them with superb citizen-politicians."

I asked for examples of "superb citizen-politicians" whether or not they existed in your lifetime or not.

You've actually named one before, and I've a sneaking suspicion you know where I am heading with this.

[Mia T]

I understood the question. What I didn't get was the 'brethren' comment....

[jla]

I understood the question.

Then why didn't you answer it?

What I didn't get was the 'brethren' comment....

It was just serendipitous, for myself, that you used that term. I used it a while back, referring to Jews and their brethren, and the two I put in the To: box on my next-to-prev. post labeled me an anti-Semite for using it. They thought I was being condescending even though I explained that I have used the word for other nationalities/groups/religious denominations.
Sorry for the sidetrack on your thread, but when I seen you had used the term I couldn't resist.

[Mia T]

But, as they are my brethren, literally... I don't see how that charge, however dumb, would apply in my case....

As to your question, I have so little regard for that slimy self-selected subgroup of Homo sapiens, the professional politician, it is difficult to think of one of sufficient character, ability and imagination to lead a country divided and prosecute a new kind of war.

If you twist my arm, I'd say the obvious choice is Lincoln.

Lincoln had the intellect and courage and imagination to think... and act... outside the box.

He understood that 'the stakes of the war, the justice of the cause, the casualties saved by foreshortening the conflict, the atrocities committed by the other side, and similar factors... must be weighed in the statesman's balance.' ¹

He understood that the underlying premise of our hyperfastidious polity, (that we must remain in the system to save the system) is fallacious at best and tantamount to Lady Liberty lifting herself up by her own bootstraps. ²

He was not a linear thinker. The clintons and the left, insofar as they think at all, are linear thinkers.

And he had an eloquence capable of uniting a bitterly divided nation....

DEBUNKING CINDY SHEEHAN
HEAR ABE LINCOLN/JOHNNY CASH + PBS' NEIL CONAN
by Mia T, 8.31.05


(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)

 

"You tell me the truth. You tell me that my son died for oil. You tell me that my son died to make your friends rich. You tell me my son died to spread the cancer of Pax Americana, imperialism in the Middle East."--Cindy Sheehan

"And if you think I won't say bulls**t to the President, I say move on, cause I'll say what's on my mind."--Cindy Sheehan

 

The trusty triad's half-truths, exaggerations and outright lies, confounded by fog of war, vagaries of peace and uncharted territory of asymmetric netherworlds, remind us that things are not always what they first seem. The UN Oil-for-Food scandal, for example, has shown us it was not "going to war with Iraq" that was "all about oil," but rather, "not going to war with Iraq." The Left, we now see, had that one, (as they have most things), exactly backward.

The dernier cri of seditious and corrupt Leftists everywhere, pro-islamofascist-terrorist radical chic renders the Left, irrespective of policy, no less dangerous to Western civilization than the terrorists they aid and abet.

Mia T, 5.15.04
pro-islamofascist-terrorist radical chic
WHY THE LEFT IS DANGEROUS FOR AMERICA

 

 

"We didn't understand why the United States was there. We never thought that Iraq was an imminent threat to the United States."--Cindy Sheehan

 

"Some have said we must not act until the threat is imminent. Since when have terrorists and tyrants announced their intentions, politely putting us on notice before they strike? If this threat is permitted to fully and suddenly emerge, all actions, all words, and all recriminations would come too late. Trusting in the sanity and restraint of Saddam Hussein is not a strategy, and it is not an option."

President Bush

"He was murdered by Bush."--Cindy Sheehan

"You get that evil maniac out here, 'cause a Gold Star Mother, somebody whose blood is on his hands, has some questions for him."--Cindy Sheehan

"The biggest terrorist is George W. Bush."--Cindy Sheehan

 

"This seems to be the President's reasons for continuing the war. Because he's killed so many American soldiers already, he has to kill more and I believe that's the most insane and immoral reason for continuing the war"--Cindy Sheehan

 

 

Fourscore and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent a new nation, conceived in liberty and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.

Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation or any nation so conceived and so dedicated can long endure. We are met on a great battlefield of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion of that field as a final resting-place for those who here gave their lives that that nation might live. It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this.

But, in a larger sense, we cannot dedicate, we cannot consecrate, we cannot hallow this ground. The brave men, living and dead who struggled here have consecrated it far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little note nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here. It is for us the living rather to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us -- that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion -- that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain, that this nation under God shall have a new birth of freedom, and that government of the people, by the people, for the people shall not perish from the earth.

Abraham Lincoln
"Gettysburg Address"
November 19, 1863

CINDY SHEEHAN: ECHO OF THE LEFT
the democrats are gonna get us killed (kerry, clinton + sandy berger's pants) series₅
by Mia T, 8.28.05


(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)

 

COPYRIGHT MIA T 2005

[Mia T]

ping

[SJackson]

It was just serendipitous, for myself, that you used that term. I used it a while back, referring to Jews and their brethren, and the two I put in the To: box on my next-to-prev. post labeled me an anti-Semite for using it. They thought I was being condescending even though I explained that I have used the word for other nationalities/groups/religious denominations. Sorry for the sidetrack on your thread, but when I seen you had used the term I couldn't resist.

Nor could you resist "forgetting" the purported offenders in your response.

Would you please link the post were I called you an antisemite for using the term brethern. I don't remember that and if it actually happened, which I seriously doubt, I suspect you're deliberately omitting the context.

[Victor]

Mia, I notice some posters (including yourself) who respond to other posters with :) or ;)

What do these mean? Thanks.

[Mia T]

a smile and a smile with a wink respectively. ;)

[advertising guy]

Mia T

all those linked reasons prove Hillary is a pile of living breathing dung and "they" admit it.

But here is why "they" are dumping now.
.... John Kerry.

Kerry is an idiot, you know it, "they" know it
and Kerry knows it.

But Kerry's numbers were close to Dubya's......Dubya got 3 million more right ?

Dubya won in 2000 by how many ?

Someone will "Foley" ole Hillary and a handsome
next slick talker will find those 3 million votes

All Hillary can do it take Kerry's numbers and MINUS
another 1 million.

The thing about this batch of democrats/socialists/marxists/athiests/media is, just like
the terrorists, "they" only have to be right once and we have to be right 100% of the time.

Your mind helps, thanks.

[Victor]

a smile and a smile with a wink respectively. ;)

Thanks!!

[Mia T]

you're quite welcome :)

[Mia T]

The repeated phrase, 'I tried to kill him' along with the other demeanor features displayed, seem typical of the feigned passionate sincerity that psychopaths typically use to substitute for honest feeling which is an emotional state they are incapable of producing/experiencing.

Also, "I tried to kill him" is almost instinctively a statement/sentence structure any normal person would avoid since, expressed in that form, it tramples on basic moral taboos. Here, it is as if Clinton is trying to convey the impression the attempt was undertaken bare handed.

Indeed he responds like a man whose masculinity has been put at issue, not like a former president who has been asked if his administration "did enough" in response to what turned out to be a growing and very serious problem.

--Gail Wynand

THE CLINTONS' EASY DISREGARD FOR GENOCIDE & TERRORISM
the role of clinton cowardice & self-aggrandizement)

Precisely!!

Will comment on all your excellent points--these and the others you make--later today if I have a chance.

[Mia T]

Note in the clinton Africa movie, bill 'for the chil'run' clinton is concerned with HIS safety, not the child's. If not for the quick action of the African leader, the child would have been crushed.

[Mia T]

Also, compare clinton's face with the secret service agent's:
cowardice vs. courage

[Mia T]

Thanx.
Will be posting something on Foley soon....

[Mia T]

'KILL BILL'
THE CLINTON-FOLEY NEXUS: A THEORY

[Mia T]

fyi

[Mia T]

fyi

 

In the much talked-about Chris Wallace-Bill Clinton interview on Fox, Clinton made several pointed insistences to Wallace that "at least I tried" to confront terror. This of course implies that the Clinton administration gave a damn in the first place. But how does one reconcile that with the fact that this man allied us with al Qaeda in the Balkans?

That Clinton had a tantrum over an obvious question asking why he didn't go after bin Laden, that he would consider such an interview a "hit job," is high comedy. This diva, unused to being challenged by the media except on sexual matters, can't even appreciate that in seven years, not one interviewer has ever asked him a single question about why he allied us with al Qaeda-trained terrorists who fabricated a genocide in Kosovo, in a war of aggression against a multi-ethnic European nation that never threatened any of its neighbors, much less the United States.

On page 225 of his new book "In the Line of Fire," Pervez Musharraf writes that it is believed that Omar Sheikh, the mastermind behind reporter Daniel Pearl's kidnapping, "was recruited by the British intelligence agency MI-6. It is said that MI-6 persuaded him to take an active part in demonstrations against Serbian aggression in Bosnia and even sent him to Kosovo to join the jihad."

Here we have a Muslim leader admitting what our own leaders will not: that with the U.S.-led mischief in the Balkans, the West was facilitating, supporting and financing a jihad in Europe. Musharraf's statement is consistent with the 9/11 Commission's finding that the "groundwork for a true terrorist network was being laid" in 1990s Bosnia, as former Senate Republican Policy Committee analyst James Jatras described it in his testimony at the Milosevic trial in 2004.

And in the Commission Report this has stayed, never to be spoken of since by any of our hard-nosed journalists of varying political stripes who dutifully "question" politicians' motivations for war. Understandably, they wouldn't want to alienate the President of Peace by bringing up not only that he didn't go after bin Laden, but that he did his bidding. For they would get more than the knee-poking that Chris Wallace got.

But as early as 1997, there was a Senate Republican Policy Committee report titled "Clinton-Approved Iranian Arms Transfers Help Turn Bosnia into Militant Islamic Base." And in 2003 Gregory Copley, president of International Strategic Studies Association, wrote an analysis titled "Bosnian Official Links With Terrorism, Including 9/11, Become Increasingly Apparent as Clinton, Clark Attempt to Justify Support of Bosnian Militants."

,,, That much hyped (and ever-mutating) figure of 8,000 Bosnian-Muslim bodies in Srebrenica ensures all the immunity the former Clinton officials could hope for, by silencing any poor-taste, would-be questioners. Thanks to which Hillary Clinton -- who, despite her unofficial capacity at the time, green-lit the 1999 Kosovo war crime three days before we embarked on it -- stands a serious chance of becoming a presidential candidate and reinstating the band of war criminals from her husband's administration: Albright, Holbrooke, Clark, Berger and Cohen et al.

... Unfortunately, the Bush policy on the Balkans has been to default to the pro-terror policies of the Clinton era, while the still-powerful Clinton cronies, including Wesley Clark and Richard Holbrooke, have been very busy burying their defecation in Kosovo. To that end, Congress, the State Department and almost every last NGO remain committed to Kosovo independence by early 2007, that is to the establishment of a mono-ethnic mafia-terror state headed by indicted war criminals. All the while, the original architects of this nail in our own coffin continue to wax authoritative on talk shows, freely touting their "successful war" in which they "stopped a genocide" -- knowing the statement will go unchallenged. And it does.

Though the dots remain purposefully unconnected, history, karma and consequence prove that what happens in the Balkans doesn't stay in the Balkans. Witness Madrid, London, Netanya and, as the Commission found, even 9/11.

As Copley wrote of Brock's Media Cleansing: "That there were genuine initial misunderstandings on the part of the world's media with regard to the Balkan situation is clear. But the fact that the media -- on whose judgments governments made policies -- allowed itself [sic] to be duped by propagandists, and that editors then refused to recant when their errors became obvious: there lies the essence of Brock's indictmentÖ.If Watergate was the modern starting point for agenda-based reporting, then the Balkan wars showed that, unchecked, the media could, without accountability, bring about the downfall of nations.

And that Wasn't Even the Tough Question, Primadonna Bill
By Julia Gorin
Jewish World Review
Oct. 4, 2006 / 12 Tishrei, 5767