Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

CNN's Jackass Cafferty is way off base.

The Geneva convention says that these terrorists are not uniform soldiers and thus not entitled to protection.

Too bad this "reporter" can read the agreement. Moreover, the U.S. Supreme Court cannot rule on an international agreement, only on the Constitution.

The POTUS is Supreme in Foreign and Military matters.

1 posted on 09/30/2006 12:32:13 PM PDT by Prost1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Prost1

This is proof positive that Cafferty and the rest of the left really DO want our president to be tried/hanged for "war crimes."

Traitors all. I think I want to throw up.


2 posted on 09/30/2006 12:39:51 PM PDT by rightazrain (Past is prologue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Prost1

Just another Olbermann wannabe.


3 posted on 09/30/2006 12:40:26 PM PDT by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Prost1

Cafferty is to be pitied.

He's just an old, old man who should be retired but looks like he forgot to contribute to his 401K


4 posted on 09/30/2006 12:42:26 PM PDT by Chuck54 ( "Your right to privacy is not as important as my right to live".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Prost1
LOL....you are right. Cafferty is CNN's jackass.

Just watching him and Blitzed french kiss each other is something to behold.

Any day now I expect CNN to add Herr Olberwomann to their stable of asses.

7 posted on 09/30/2006 1:33:25 PM PDT by OldFriend (Should we wait for them to come and kill us again? President Karzai 9/26/06)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Prost1
After Club Gitmo is closed by efforts of the MSM, liberal commentators like Cafferty should be issued terrorist detainees to care for and interrogate in the pc method.
8 posted on 09/30/2006 2:29:28 PM PDT by shove_it
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Prost1

The President hasn't done anything to warrant a pardon.


9 posted on 09/30/2006 2:32:15 PM PDT by Not A Snowbird (Official RKBA Landscaper and Arborist, Duchess of Green Leafy Things)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Prost1
Moreover, the U.S. Supreme Court cannot rule on an international agreement, only on the Constitution.

Bingo!

But has anyone told the USSC?

10 posted on 09/30/2006 2:37:06 PM PDT by Ole Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson