Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Internal Review of Contacts with the Office of the Speaker Regarding the Cong. Mark Foley Matter
Office of Speaker Hastert | Saturday, September 30, 2006

Posted on 09/30/2006 7:02:50 PM PDT by kristinn

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

1 posted on 09/30/2006 7:02:53 PM PDT by kristinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Howlin; nopardons; Dianna
This it not up on the Speaker's website yet. I found it via The Chicago Tribune.
2 posted on 09/30/2006 7:05:00 PM PDT by kristinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

Looks like the "plausible deniability" game.


3 posted on 09/30/2006 7:09:28 PM PDT by RKBA Democrat (Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
The press release is also at The Hotline.
4 posted on 09/30/2006 7:09:43 PM PDT by kristinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

Good find, Kristinn! This needs to be widely disseminated immediately.


5 posted on 09/30/2006 7:11:56 PM PDT by REDWOOD99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

Amazing. These birds never even have time to read the content of the many bills they pass, but there's always time for listening to lobbyists and trying for daliances with one sex or the other.


6 posted on 09/30/2006 7:16:04 PM PDT by holyscroller (A wise man's heart directs him toward the right, but the foolish man's heart directs him to the left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
"The Clerk asked to see the text of the email. Congressman Alexander's office declined citing the fact that the family wished to maintain as much privacy as possible and simply wanted the contact to stop. The Clerk asked if the email exchange was of a sexual nature and was assured it was not. Congressman Alexander's Chief of Staff characterized the email exchange as over-friendly."

The parents only wanted it to cease and if they had thought it was more of a problem at the time they would have called the police.
7 posted on 09/30/2006 7:21:08 PM PDT by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

Once again. Thank you.


8 posted on 09/30/2006 7:22:39 PM PDT by OldFriend (Should we wait for them to come and kill us again? President Karzai 9/26/06)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

What is the large point? I am lost on this.


9 posted on 09/30/2006 7:22:52 PM PDT by don-o (Proudly posting without reading the thread since 1998. (stolen from one cool dude))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: holyscroller
The parents did not want this pursued. Since the explicit nature of the communication was not revealed I don't see how Hastert's office can be faulted.

Let's not allow the drive by media to dictate our response.

loveya, Jan

10 posted on 09/30/2006 7:24:10 PM PDT by OldFriend (Should we wait for them to come and kill us again? President Karzai 9/26/06)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
Let's not allow the drive by media to dictate our response.

But some drive by "true conservative" posters on FR will.

11 posted on 09/30/2006 7:32:18 PM PDT by Dane ("Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall" Ronald Reagan, 1987)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

When a 50yo gay man starts asking a 16yo boy for a picture, anybody with common sense would start asking some difficult questions.

If those questions weren't asked, it was either stupidity or corruption.

I think Hastert needs to resign, and Foley belongs in prison.


12 posted on 09/30/2006 7:38:25 PM PDT by nj26 (Border Security=Homeland Security... Put Our Military on the Border! (Proud2BNRA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

What puzzles me is that 10-11 months went by after Foley was warned to have no contact with the page. If the boy was still receiving e-mails, especially the obscene ones reported in the news, why did he not report them either to the authorities or his parents?

Something smells. Either the boy and his parents knew of these more explicit e-mails much earlier and chose to neither say nor do anything for months or they did make a fuss to the House authorities who decided to cover it up.

As I cannnot fathom either scenario, I suspect that the parents must have approached a third party, perhaps the press, who advised them to remain silent, keep track of them and bide their time.




13 posted on 09/30/2006 7:39:02 PM PDT by RonnG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RonnG

"Either the boy and his parents knew of these more explicit e-mails much earlier and chose to neither say nor do anything for months or they did make a fuss to the House authorities who decided to cover it up."

Or the boy knew about continued emails but the parents only found out later.


14 posted on 09/30/2006 7:40:55 PM PDT by nj26 (Border Security=Homeland Security... Put Our Military on the Border! (Proud2BNRA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: RonnG
If the boy was still receiving e-mails, especially the obscene ones reported in the news, why did he not report them either to the authorities or his parents?

The e-mails were not sexually explicit, creepy yes, but not sexually explicit.

The IM's to another page were sexually explicit. The page who worked for Alexander did not receive sexually explicit e-mails or IM's.

Hastert and the leadership had no knowledge of the IM's.

15 posted on 09/30/2006 7:44:34 PM PDT by Dane ("Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall" Ronald Reagan, 1987)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: nj26

Haster had no knowledge of the IM's, but you do your usual kneejerk dance.


16 posted on 09/30/2006 7:45:41 PM PDT by Dane ("Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall" Ronald Reagan, 1987)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: RonnG
If the boy was still receiving e-mails, especially the obscene ones reported in the news, why did he not report them either to the authorities or his parents?

Could the IM's have been to a different boy?

17 posted on 09/30/2006 7:51:20 PM PDT by alnick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: nj26
I wish there was a law that would put Foley behind bars but unless there was porn involved or the authorities can prove he had at least sexual intentions then he's not going to jail. Dirty talk is just that, dirty talk and is protected as free speech. The parents could have very easily become parents and either took the kids communication devises or had the kid change all his e-mail addresses so as the perv would leave him alone. Know what your kids are doing all the time and it definitely helps keep the pervs away.
18 posted on 09/30/2006 7:52:35 PM PDT by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Pink Elephant in the Room. Why are we all assuming that all Foley did was cyber sex? I think we shouldn't be shocked if another shoe drops.


19 posted on 09/30/2006 7:53:46 PM PDT by dogbyte12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

Thanks for posting this. Had to laugh when Ann Coulter pointed out that such problems have existed for the Democrats, that those individuals again ran for office, and won. When she told the Dem operative that Republicans won't accept the same behavior, the Dem had nothing else to say and shifted uncomfortably. He knew she was right.


20 posted on 09/30/2006 7:55:26 PM PDT by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson