Posted on 10/01/2006 1:37:09 PM PDT by Stoat
|
Contact:
Michael.J.Lewis@williams.edu
Education:
B.A. Haverford College
Ph.D. University of Pennsylvania
Courses Taught:
ARTH 264: American Art and Architecture, 1600 to Present
ARTH 257: Architecture 1700-1900
Michael J. Lewis teaches American art and architecture, and also modern European architecture, 1700 to the present. A graduate of Haverford College, he studied at the University of Hannover, Germany, and received his Ph.D. from the University of Pennsylvania. He has taught at Bryn Mawr College; McGill University, Montreal; and the University of Natal, South Africa.
He writes on art and culture, and his writings have appeared in the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, commentary, and the New Criterion. His books include Frank Furness: Architecture and the Violent Mind (W. W. Norton, 2001) and The Gothic Revival (Thames and Hudson, 2002). His book August Reichensperger: The Politics of the
German Gothic Revival (Architectural History Foundation, 1993) received the Society of Architectural Historians' Alice Davis Hitchcock award for the best book of the year. He has been at Williams since 1993.
Publications
1986
The Birth of a German Academic Tradition, in Friedrich Weinbrenner: Architect of Karlsruhe, D. B. Brownlee, ed. (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania)
Library of Congress Competition, Philadelphia City Hall Tower and other entries and biographies in Drawing Toward Building: Philadelphia Architectural Graphics, J. F. O'Gorman, ed., (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania)
1987
Paestumstil in Fachwerk: Eine Anmerkung zu Weinbrenner in Hannover, in Georg Hoeltje Festschrift, Günther Kokkelink and Sid Auffahrt, eds. (Hanover, Germany: Institut für Bau- und Kunstgeschichte)
1991
Frank Furness, The Complete Works, co-author with George E. Thomas and Jeffrey A. Cohen (New York: Princeton Architectural Press); revised edition 1996
Eleanor Donnelley Erdman Hall and The Dominican Mother House of St. Catherine de Ricci, in Louis I. Kahn: In the Realm of Architecture, D. B. Brownlee and D. DeLong, eds. (New York: Rizzoli), pp. 352-357; 384-389
1992
Modernism without Program, in American Architectural Masterpieces (New York: Princeton Architectural Press), pp. xvii - xxi
La Geometrie de la Fortification: Traites et Manuels, 1500 - 1800/ The Geometry of Defense, Catalogue of an exhibition at the Canadian Centre for Architecture (Montreal: Canadian Centre for Architecture)
Silent, Weird, Beautiful: Philadelphia City Hall, Nineteenth Century (vol. 11, nos. 3 and 4), pp. 13-21
What Louis Kahn Built, Commentary 93, no. 3 (March), pp. 39-43
Toys that Teach, Catalogue of an exhibition at the Canadian Centre for Architecture (Montreal: Canadian Centre for Architecture)
Review of Hans-Joseph Böker, Die Backsteinarchitektur des Mittelalters in Deutschland, Society of Architectural Historians Journal VI, no. 4 (December), pp. 456-457
1993
The Politics of the German Gothic Revival (New York: Architectural History Foundation and MIT Press) Winner Alice Davis Hitchcock Prize
Four encyclopedia entries (Cologne Cathedral[co-authored with H. J. Böker], Georg Ludwig Friedrich Laves Detlef Lienau, and Bruce Price, in International Dictionary of Architects and Architecture, R. J. Van Wynckt, ed. (Chicago: St. James Press)
He was not a connoisseur: Peter Widener and his House, Nineteenth Century (vol. 12, nos. 3 and 4), pp. 27-36
Review of Brian Ladd, Politics of Order: German City Planning, Society of Architectural Historians Journal LII, no. 3 (September), pp. 344-345
1994
Utopia and the well-ordered fortress: J. M. Schwalbach's town plans of 1635, Architectural History (vol. 37), pp. 24-36
Exhibition at the Chicago Art Institute, Karl Friedrich Schinkel Exhibition, 1781-1841: The Drama of Architecture, Society of Architectural Historians Journal 54, no. 1 (March), pp. 72-75
1995
Canadian Architecture and the Search for National Identity, 581 Architects, Yuki Fuchigami, ed. (Tokyo: Toto Shuppan), pp. 235-242
Review of Harry Mallgrave, ed., Otto Wagner, AA Files 28, pp. 107-109
1996
Drawn from the Source: The Travel Drawings of Louis I. Kahn, catalogue of an exhibition at the Williams College Museum of Art, co-author with Eugene J. Johnson (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press)
Six encyclopedia entries (Karl Wilhelm von Bötticher, Joseph von Görres, August Reichensperger, Rundbogenstil, Vincenz Statz and Georg Gottlob Ungewitter) in The Dictionary of Art, Jane Turner, ed. (New York: Grove)
Church always builds on its past, Op-ed in Los Angeles Times (June 9)
Father Rapp's Garden at Economy, with LuAnn DeCunzo, et al, in Landscape Archaeology: Studies in Reading and Interpreting the American Historical Landscape, R. Yamin and K. B. Metheny, eds. (U. of Tennessee Press), pp. 91-117
The Idea of the American Building, in G. E. Kidder Smith, Sourcebook of American Architecture (New York: Princeton Architectural Press), pp. 3-16
Homer, Hopper and the Critics, New Criterion 15, no. 1 (September), pp. 74-80
Recent Books on American Architecture, Nineteenth Century (vol. 15)
1997
Pedantry Spoils the World War II Memorial, Weekly Standard 2, no. 22 (Feb. 17) pp. 34-35
Robert Hughes' Amerika, New Criterion 15, no. 10 (June), pp. 14-20
The Architectural Competition for the Philadelphia Academy of Music, 1854-1855, Nineteenth Century (vol. 16, no. 2), pp. 3-10
Two of the Eight, review of The Letters of Robert Henri and John Sloan, New Criterion 16, no. 1 (September), pp. 65-68
Color in Architecture, Notice on Dover Reprint, Nineteenth Century (vol. 16, no. 1)
Review of Andrew Graham Dixon, Paper Museums, Washington Times (October 12), p. B8
Teutonic Tectonics, review of Mitchell Schwarzer, Tectonics, Design Book Review (fall), pp. 15-17
1998
Monument to Philanthropy: The Design and Building of Girard College, 1832-1848, co-author with Bruce Laverty and Michelle Taillon Taylor (Philadelphia: Girard College)
How Bad is the Getty? Commentary 105, no. 3 (March), pp. 64-68
Reassessing '68 in New York and Paris: Activism, Architecture, and the Academy, New Criterion
Art, Politics and Clement Greenberg, Commentary 105, no. 6 (June), pp. 57-61
Review of Anthony Bailey, Standing in the Sun: A Life of J. M. W. Turner, Washington Times (December 27, p. B8)
Review of Peter Watson, Sotheby's: The Inside Story, Washington Times (March 22), p. B-6.
Oxfords Least Bit Crazy Architects, Review of Frederick ODwyer, The Architecture of Deane and Woodward and James F. O'Gorman, H. H. Richardson, Nineteenth Century (vol. 17, no. 1), pp. 38-40
Review of Michael Kimmelman, Portraits, Washington Times (August)
1999
The Master of Drip, Commentary 107, no. 1 (February), pp. 56-60
Review of Kathleen Foster, Captain Watson's Travels, Pa. Magazine of History and Biography CXXIII, nos. 1/2(January-April), pp. 102-104
Wilhelm Lorenz: Die Hannoversche Schule in Amerika, Günther Kokkelink Festschrift, Stefan Amt, ed. (Hanover, Germany: Institut für Bau- und Kunstgeschichte), pp. 143-150
Bearing Witness, review of Hilton Kramer, Twilight of the Intellectuals, Commentary 107, no. 6 (June) pp. 65-67
"The Guggenheim in Bilbao," New Criterion 17, no. 10 (June), pp. 52-54
Review of James F. O'Gorman, Accomplished in All Departments of Art: Hammatt Billings of Boston, caa.reviews (June 25)
"Of Kitsch and Coins," Commentary 108, no. 3 (October), pp. 32-36
"Recent Books by Members," Reviews of Margot and Carol Gayle, Cast Iron Architecture; James F. O'Gorman, Hammatt Billings; Daniel D. Reiff, Architecture in Fredonia, Nineteenth Century
2000
The American View of Landscape, New Criterion 18, no. 8 (April), pp. 4-13. Reprinted in SIRS electronic data base
Review of Klaus Jan Philipp, Um 1800: Architekturtheorie und Architekturkritik in Deutschland zwischen 1790 und 1810, Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians 59, no. 2 (June)
Die Hamburger Baukultur in der ersten Hälfte des 19ten Jahrhunderts, in David Klemm and Hartmut Frank, eds., Alexis de Chateauneuf 1799-1853, Architekt in Hamburg, London und Oslo, (Hamburg: Museum für Kunst und Gewerbe, 2000), pp. 27-35
Provocation, Politicsand Beautiful Objects Too, review of Lynne Munson, Exhibitionism: Art in an Era of Intolerance, Wall Street Journal (December 13), p. A-24
2001
Frank Furness: Architecture and the Violent Mind (W. W. Norton)
When the Craftsman Met the Machine, review of Isabelle Frank, The Theory of Decorative Art, Wall Street Journal (January 29), p. A24
Mumbling Monuments, Commentary 111, no. 2 (February), pp. 50-54
When Presidents Speak, Commentary 111, no. 6 (June), pp. 48-51. Reprinted in Voices of Advocacy in American Democracy (University of Missouri, 2002)
Louis Sullivan After Functionalism New Criterion (September), pp. 50-57. Reprinted by SIRS Knowledge Source TM
From Bauhaus to Bilbao, Commentary 112, no. 2 (September), pp. 40-45
In a Changing Skyline, a Sudden, Glaring Void," New York Times (September 16), Week in Review, p. 1
"Owen Biddle and the Young Carpenter's Assistant," in Kenneth Hafertepe and James F. O'Gorman, eds., American Architects and their Books Before 1848 (University of Massachusetts), pp. 149-163
Niagara Falls and Study of a Girl (Fanette Reider), in American Dreams, American Art to 1950 in the Williams College Museum of Art, Nancy Mowll Matthews, ed. (New York: Hudson Hills Press), pp. 72-72, 117-120
War Comes to Williams, Commentary 112, no. 4 (November), pp. 49-51
Reconsidering the Idea of High Art, review of Larry Shiner, The Invention of Art: A Cultural History, Washington Times (December 30)
Review of Catherine Voorsanger and John Howat, eds., Art and the Empire City: New York, 1825-1861, Nineteenth Century 21, no. 2 (Fall), pp. 42-43
The Realism of Thomas Eakins, New Criterion (December), pp. 27-32
2002
The Gothic Revival (Thames and Hudson). Japanese translation, 2004
The Look at Me Strut of a Swagger Building, New York Times (Jan. 6) Week in Review, p. 1
Visions of Ground Zero, Commentary 113, no. 4 (April), pp. 52-55
Fixer Uppers: How Much is too Much?, New York Times (April 6, 2002), Week in Review, section 4, p. 16
Ego, Vanity and Megalomania, review of The Letters of Lewis Mumford and Frank Lloyd Wright, New Criterion 20, no. 9 (May), pp. 72-76
It Depends On What Real Is, New York Times (June 23) Week in Review, p. 3
Aesthetic Movements, review of Brushes With History: Art Criticism from The Nation, Commentary (July-August), vol. 114, no. 1, pp. 70-76
American Sublime, review of exhibition, New Criterion 21, no. 1 (September), pp. 27-33
Mourning Without Meaning, Commentary 114, no. 4 (November), pp. 56-60
Art History, Oxford Style, New Criterion 21, no. 4 (December), pp. 17-21
2003
Review of Günther Passavant, Wolf Caspar von Klengel, Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians 62, no. 1 (March), pp. 138-140
Into the Void with Daniel Libeskind, Commentary 115, no. 5 (May), pp. 40-44
A Nicholson in America, Alexander Thomson Society Newsletter, no. 33 (May), pp. 6-9, 17
Mod Quad, Chronicle of Higher Education XLIX (July 11), no. 44, pp. B7-B9
Glass Walls to Bunkers: The New Look of U. S. Embassies, New York Times (July 27), Week in Review, section 4, p. 6
Review of Michael Hall, ed., Gothic Architecture and Its meanings, 1550-1830, Times Literary Supplement, no. 5234 (July 25), p. 29
How to Avoid a 9/11 Memorial Disaster, Wall Street Journal (August 12), p. D-8
E. Francis Baldwin and American Architecture, Introduction to Carlos P. Avery, E. Francis Baldwin: The B&O, Baltimore, and Beyond (Baltimore: Baltimore Architecture Foundation), pp. xv - xvii
Cartooning, Left and Right, Commentary 116, no. 3 (October), pp. 67-22 (reprinted in Current, December 2003)
The Art of Art History [review of Paul Johnsons Art: A New History], New Criterion 22, no. 3 (November), pp. 67-70
All sail, no anchor: architecture after modernism, New Criterion 22, no. 4 (December), pp. 4-16. Anthologized in Lengthened Shadows (Encounter Books, 2004)
Review, four recent books on Cass Gilbert, Nineteenth Century XXIII, no. 2, pp. 44-45
2004
Patrick OBrians Excellent Adventure, Commentary 117, no. 1 (January), pp. 47-50
Exhibition Note. Shock of the Old: Christopher Dresser at the Cooper Hewitt, New Criterion 22, no. 10 (June), pp. 42-44
Der Rundbogenstil und die Karlsruhe-Philadelphia Achse," in Dauer und Wechsel: Festschrift für Harold Hammer-Schenk (Berlin: Lukas Verlag), pp. 128-138
Review of Kathleen Curran, The Romanesque Revival: Religion, Politics and Transnational Exchange, Sacred Architecture, no. 9 (2004), p. 33. Reprinted in Nineteenth Century (vol. 25, no. 2, 2005), pp. 43-44
Architecture (Bling!), Commentary 118, no. 3 (October), pp. 71-75
MoMA Reopened, New Criterion 23, no. 4 (December), pp. 15-18
Op Art [review of Art Spiegelmans In the Shadow of No Towers], Commentary 118, no. 5 (December), pp. 73-75
Review of Vincent Scully, Modern Architecture and Others Essays, selected and edited by Neil Levine, Society of Architectural Historians Journal LXIII, no. 4 (December), pp. 567-569
2005
The Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts as Building and as Idea, in The Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts: 200 Years of Excellence, 1805-2005 (Philadelphia: Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts) pp. 63-73
Rara Avis [review of Richard Rhodes John James Audubon: The Making of an American], New Criterion 23, no. 5 (January), pp. 66-68
Kahn and the Belated Monument, in Coming to Light: The Louis I. Kahn Monument to Franklin D. Roosevelt in New York City (New York: Cooper Union School of Architecture), pp. 22-25
Enjoy it, Julia, While it Lasts [an essay on technology and changing ideals of beauty], New York Times, Thursday styles (May 19), p. 3
Philadelphie, lutopie modest de William Penn, in De lEsprit des villes: Nancy et lEurope urbaine au siècle des Lumières 1720-1770 (Nancy, 2005), pp. 295-297
Dancing to the New Rules, A Rhapsody in Chrome, New York Times (May 26), F8-F9
A Predilection for Facts and Things [Review of Henry Adams, Eakins Revealed], New York Sun (June 2), p. 16
Pleasure domes for Millionaires, and Other Lost Boys, New York Times, Sunday styles, p. 10 (June 19)
In What Style Should We Write? [text of plenary address at 2003 SAH conference], Newsletter of the Society of Architectural Historians XLIX, no. 4 (August), pp. 2-4
Review of Kathleen Solomonson, The Chicago Tribune Competition: Skyscraper Design and Cultural Change in the 1920s and Joseph Siry, The Chicago Auditorium Building: Adler and Sullivans Architecture and the City, Art Bulletin LXXXVII, no. 3 (September), pp. 456-548
Spacious Perspectives [review of William H. Jordy, Symbolic Essence and other writings], New Criterion 24, no. 3 (November), pp. 68-71
Fiasco at Ground Zero, New Criterion 24, no. 4 (December), pp. 10-15
2006
American Art and Architecture (Thames & Hudson)
Miniatures [review of Jed Perls New Art City], Commentary 121, no. 1 (January), pp. 80-82
Art for Sale, Commentary 131, no. 3 (March), pp. 32-38
Review of Brian Hanson, Architects and the Building World and Rebecca Daniels and Geoff Brandwood, eds., Ruskin and Architecture, Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians 65, no. 1 (March), pp. 140-144
Out of Order [review of Philip Rieffs My Life Among the Deathworks], Commentary 121, no. 4 (April), pp. 76-78
Between Duty and Desire [review of Gertrude Himmelfarbs The Moral Imagination], Commentary 121, no. 5 (May), pp. 69-71
Practical and Symbolic [review of Peter Pennoyer and Anne Walkers The Architecture of Warren and Wetmore] New Criterion 24, no. 9 (May), pp. 73-75
Art and College History, Written in Stone, Chronicle of Higher Education (April 28), pp. B22-B24
Architecture: Renzo Piano and the Morgan Library, New Criterion 24, no. 10 (June)
The First Design for Fairmount Park, Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography CXXX, no. 3 (July)
Why so damned long? Bookmark for later.
You may notice that I posted Professor Lewis' email address, so you are of course welcome to write him and ask him why he was unable to distill the entire art and perspective of filmmaking vis-a vis the most traumatic event in American history (and possibly the world) down to just a few sentences, if you wish. He appears to be quite a brilliant man and an accomplished author, and so he will most likely be able to provide a considerably better answer than myself.
I'm sorry to hear that you found "a few paragraphs" unnecessary. Your perspective is obviously at odds with that of Professor Lewis and the editors of Commentary, and so I'm sure that they would all be interested in constructive criticism toward the end of improving his writing skills and their publication.
so you're (sic) comment comes across as little more than churlish.
Given that you initially provided no context to your criticism, I was merely responding directly and completely to your limited statement. It's difficult to please everyone, and I'm sorry that you have decided to take offense. None was intended.
Nevertheless, I'm not interested in emailing him.
In that case, you will most likely not receive a meaningful answer to your question, which is unfortunate.
I marked it for later, perhaps when I have an hour to kill, and I'll read it then.
Hopefully it won't take you that long to read; although I didn't time myself, my leisurely reading only took a few minutes.
Good review. It's sensible and well written, and understands the failings of Hollywood, which come through in distracting film techniques and curious omissions as well as leftist distortions.
But it lacks the common touch that would make it more widely readable.
I'm delighted that you found it interesting, and your impressions mirror mine in many ways.
But it lacks the common touch that would make it more widely readable.
How would you have changed it if you had the opportunity?
Well, someone like Mark Steyn is the ideal. Very few people write as well as he does. He can say fairly intellectual and complex things, all in a style that keeps you glued to the page.
But in the last resort, everyone needs to find his own style. It would be hopeless to imitate Steyn, because it would come out sounding like a Steyn imitation. Ideally, when you read a good writer's writing you seem to hear him speak. It's a gift the Irish have, in particular. Ben Jonson said, "Speak, that I may see you."
So, I can't say how the author should change his style, because it's HIS style that needs development. I can only suggest getting into the habit of listening to what you write, and trying to hear what it sounds like.
Okay, oh worshiper of many words. Enough now.
I agree that Steyn is a master and is truly a jewel in journalism's crown. I try to read everything he writes and find his perspective, literary skills and sense of humor refreshing and stimulating.
But in the last resort, everyone needs to find his own style. It would be hopeless to imitate Steyn, because it would come out sounding like a Steyn imitation. Ideally, when you read a good writer's writing you seem to hear him speak. It's a gift the Irish have, in particular. Ben Jonson said, "Speak, that I may see you."
Agreed on all counts, and thank you for the highly relevant Jonson quote. I'm reminded of the many authors who try to emulate Hemingway, and usually fall on their faces as a result. Writers definitely need to consider their audience while being true to themselves, and if Professor Lewis wanted to achieve the same level of popularity that Steyn has he would be well advised to 'lighten up". Being a career academic, I'm not sure how easy that would be for him.
So, I can't say how the author should change his style, because it's HIS style that needs development. I can only suggest getting into the habit of listening to what you write, and trying to hear what it sounds like.
Very true, but I think that there's a marked difference in style between the typical Commentary piece, which tends to be more of an in-depth treatment of it's subject, and the usual Chicago Tribune offering, which will be more of a populist nature. What we are seeing is most likely the difference between an academic writer who is publishing in a somewhat more scholarly journal versus a writer who uses a wider array of 'hooks' to draw in a more diverse cross section of readers.
Yes, it's "academic" writing.
In fact, it's pretty good for academic writing. These days, a lot of academics are completely impenetrable, because that's the fashion. This article is at least straightforward and readable.
Your mention of the author's name, Lewis, reminds me that C. S. Lewis was an academic. But he could write in a most readable style, and he does so even in his more academic works.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.