Skip to comments.
Foley, C.R.E.W., Soros and Jason Leopold (TruthOut)
The Wide Awakes ^
| 10.02.06
| Permalink??
Posted on 10/02/2006 2:41:35 PM PDT by rface
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
To: onyx
Here is the link to Mr. Rodgers bragging that he had the email before the story broke! Someone linked it in another thread.
http://www.haloscan.com/comments/blogactive/115975284374768134/#207771
Here is what he says:
"As people know, it's not always possible for me to disclose my role in some of the activities.
I can say this. I had the emails before they were on the net. Additionally, I had the additional emails, written by the page to a friend. The story was being written by a number of outlets and I provided additional information to reporters involved in the breaking of this story.
Was the central figure in reporting on Foley's latest scandal? Never said I was. Was my work on the case important to helping make sure it came out before the election? Yes.
Did I have any idea that the GOP leadership was engaged in a cover-up? Nope. Do I love the fact that they are trying to spin this as 'naughty emails?' Yup. because it shows how out of tought they are about queer closet cases."
To: rface
As in renewing the "No Child's Behind Left Behind" act? /s
22
posted on
10/02/2006 3:06:30 PM PDT
by
xcamel
(Press to Test, Release to Detonate)
To: rface
Wait a doggone minute here! What happened to the Congressional immunity that was so important when William Jefferson, Democrat Louisiana, had his office violated? We went through days of examination of the effort to get info from the office of William Jefferson, Democrat Louisiana, and not a bit of discussion about what the evidence revealed. Even though he was taped taking money, the feds were at fault somehow.
So, doesn't Foley get the same right to stay in office? What? He's a Republican? Never mind.
23
posted on
10/02/2006 3:09:58 PM PDT
by
Defiant
(There is no god but AOL, and Muhammad uses Messenger.)
To: Fawn
he is not any worse than any man who goes after a 'teen' girl
Foley was going after boys. Since he's obviously a homo, I'm surprised that the dhimmicrats are critical. I thought homos were one of their favorite constituencies.
You don't suppose that it's just another example of dhimmicrat hypocrisy?
24
posted on
10/02/2006 3:13:55 PM PDT
by
Beckwith
(The dhimmicrats and liberal media have chosen sides and they've sided with the Jihadists.)
To: Ben Mugged
But that requires you to intercede.True, however it is still considered an IM that was saved.
I also still have ims (not word docs) on an old computer that I have not used for some time. I do not recall doing anything to save them or delete them, but they are there.
25
posted on
10/02/2006 3:15:50 PM PDT
by
TexKat
(Just because you did not see it or read it, that does not mean it did or did not happen.)
Comment #26 Removed by Moderator
To: Beckwith
It's a given that the Dems always talk out of both sides of their bodies....no need to ask that question.
27
posted on
10/02/2006 3:18:34 PM PDT
by
Fawn
(http://www.jokaroo.com/funnyvideos/toilet_obsession.html)
Comment #28 Removed by Moderator
To: Johanna B L
The boy is 22 now, was 19 then, and wasn't even a page at the time.
Those facts are being ignored by the media for the sake of the storyline.
29
posted on
10/02/2006 3:25:16 PM PDT
by
usmcobra
(I sing Karaoke the way it was meant to be sung, drunk, badly and in Japanese, that why I don't sing.)
To: rface
30
posted on
10/02/2006 3:31:53 PM PDT
by
usmcobra
(I sing Karaoke the way it was meant to be sung, drunk, badly and in Japanese, that why I don't sing.)
To: Charles Henrickson
Okay, I sifted thru some of this maze of material and so far it is only SPECULATED That Jason Leopold is involved in this. Thus far no solid proof.
31
posted on
10/02/2006 3:31:56 PM PDT
by
PJ-Comix
(Join the DUmmie FUnnies PING List for the FUNNIEST Blog on the Web)
To: rface
32
posted on
10/02/2006 3:31:57 PM PDT
by
freeangel
( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like what you say))
To: Johanna B L
Huh? I don't understand the question.
What was ignored?
Who's the favored messenger?
33
posted on
10/02/2006 3:32:28 PM PDT
by
Beckwith
(The dhimmicrats and liberal media have chosen sides and they've sided with the Jihadists.)
To: PJ-Comix
Jason desperately trying to become relevant again?
34
posted on
10/02/2006 3:34:01 PM PDT
by
tiredoflaundry
( The kinder we are to terrorists, the harsher we are to their potential victims.)
To: Beckwith
"Foley was going after boys. Since he's obviously a homo, I'm surprised that the dhimmicrats are critical. I thought homos were one of their favorite constituencies. You don't suppose that it's just another example of dhimmicrat hypocrisy?"
And this is exactly why some of the Dems are attacking Republicans like Hastert over what they knew, rather than attacking Foley, personally. The Dems are in a difficult position, trying not to alienate their Gay constituents by looking like homophobes, while still attacking Republicans for not protecting "the children."
Republicans need to point this hypocrisy out, noting that many Dems aren't upset at what Foley did, but rather what some Republicans may have not done. This is why it is just as important for Republicans to find out what Democrat operatives knew about these emails and IMs and did nothing but use them as political fodder...rather than protecting the children.
35
posted on
10/02/2006 3:39:18 PM PDT
by
cwb
(Liberalism is the opiate of the *sses.)
To: cwb
Thanks . . . that I understand.
36
posted on
10/02/2006 3:47:00 PM PDT
by
Beckwith
(The dhimmicrats and liberal media have chosen sides and they've sided with the Jihadists.)
To: usmcobra
Wow! That last post was rather educational proving how a democRATs mind works. I was waiting for the smoke to come out the back of my monitor.
37
posted on
10/02/2006 3:47:56 PM PDT
by
AmeriBrit
(By a miracle we lived through 'Eight Clinton Years of Living Hell'....NO MORE CLINTON'S...EVER!)
To: usmcobra
38
posted on
10/02/2006 4:02:18 PM PDT
by
TexKat
(Just because you did not see it or read it, that does not mean it did or did not happen.)
To: Mo1; All
To: TexKat
Mark Foley's My Space Profile
mark
Male
52 years old
PALM BEACH, Florida
United States
Last Login: 12/16/2005
View My: Pics | Videos
Contacting mark
mark's Details
Status: Single
Zodiac Sign: Virgo
Children: I don't want kids
40
posted on
10/02/2006 4:07:25 PM PDT
by
TexKat
(Just because you did not see it or read it, that does not mean it did or did not happen.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson