Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Resign, Mr. Speaker
The Washington Times ^ | 10/3/2007

Posted on 10/03/2006 4:09:22 AM PDT by Taggart_D

The facts of the disgrace of Mark Foley, who was a Republican member of the House from a Florida district until he resigned last week, constitute a disgrace for every Republican member of Congress. Red flags emerged in late 2005, perhaps even earlier, in suggestive and wholly inappropriate e-mail messages to underage congressional pages. His aberrant, predatory -- and possibly criminal -- behavior was an open secret among the pages who were his prey. The evidence was strong enough long enough ago that the speaker should have relieved Mr. Foley of his committee responsibilities contingent on a full investigation to learn what had taken place, whether any laws had been violated and what action, up to and including prosecution, were warranted by the facts. This never happened....

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: foley; foleygate; hastert; page; rats; resign; tancredo4speaker; usefulidiots; washingtontimes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-249 next last
To: Roccus

My honest opinion is that if this scandal works and the dem/media manage to split the republicans before the election, then we deserve every bit of crap legislation they send out (and Bush signs) in the next two years. Of course I would also double or triple my contributions to GOA and NRA to fight a good fight, but it would be defense, just trying to keep the few 2-A rights we have managed to regain.


41 posted on 10/03/2006 4:54:27 AM PDT by palmer (Money problems do not come from a lack of money, but from living an excessive, unrealistic lifestyle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Taggart_D

I'm STILL waiting for your response to Post # 3 . WHY should he resign ???


42 posted on 10/03/2006 4:54:32 AM PDT by Renegade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: musikman
Right after William Jefferson resigns.

How 'bout right after William Jefferson goes to prison!!!
43 posted on 10/03/2006 4:56:46 AM PDT by true_blue_texican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Homer1
He should resign. The Republicans should also be working on their list of Democrats who were also aware of this, and getting those names out there, as well - so that they can resign too.

I might go along with you if I was assured any guilty DemocRAT would resign.

44 posted on 10/03/2006 4:57:46 AM PDT by SMM48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Taggart_D
Why should he resign?

pls. read the entire editorial-'nuff said'.

45 posted on 10/03/2006 5:03:36 AM PDT by 1234 (WHO is Responsible for ENFORCING IMMIGRATION LAWS?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DB
Yes, Congress, as the premier branch of the federal government DOES HAVE SPECIAL RIGHTS ~ one of which is to first get approval of the Speaker of the House to conduct a raid on a Congressman's office in the precincts of the House.

If you don't like that idea, may I recommend a suitible police state somewhere else for your retirement.

One thing America doesn't need is another person who disputes the rights of the House of Representatives to set its own rules.

46 posted on 10/03/2006 5:05:34 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Dane

Ouch.


47 posted on 10/03/2006 5:06:31 AM PDT by BeHoldAPaleHorse ( ~()):~)>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Homer1
. . . The Republicans should also be working on their list of Democrats who were also aware of this, and getting those names out there, as well - so that they can resign too.

That is the 'horse' here; and it needs to come before the cart of any Repubs resigning..

Had Hastert done more. . .on the 'less' info that he had at the time; (no IM's. etc ..) then the Repubs would have been attacked for discriminating against Gays. . .there is a no win here for Repubs; save to get to the truth of this scandal. The first truth has been dealt with; perp Foley is gone. WHO/HOW/WHY this has erupted now. ..rather than 'then'; needs investigating.

The Dems are political terrorists; and theyk are feverishly engaged. Hastert is tossed; they will NOT be appeased. . .

Repubs need to change the dialogue; the focus here; and NOW.

48 posted on 10/03/2006 5:07:26 AM PDT by cricket (Live Liberal free. . .or suffer their consequences. . .SAVE THE TERRORISTS! VOTE DEMOCRAT. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Taggart_D

If the Times wants someone to resign, they should call on all Senate republicans to resign. They've been a complete failure for Bush.


49 posted on 10/03/2006 5:07:52 AM PDT by gotribe (It's not a religion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhombus

I agree with you. We should demand that Barney Franks lead the investigation.


50 posted on 10/03/2006 5:08:34 AM PDT by newcthem (Brought to you by the INFIDEL PARTY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Taggart_D
There is NO evidence presented by anyone than Hastert knew about the explicit IMs. All that he knew, according to him, and disputed by NO ONE with any proof or evidence, is that Foley asked one page about how he fared in Katrina, his birthday, and a photo. NOTHING. Absolutely nothing. The facts show Democrat supporters knew, and probably Democrat leaders as well.
51 posted on 10/03/2006 5:10:34 AM PDT by PghBaldy (" Surrender NANCY!" What did you and other Dem leaders know and when about Foley???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
If Hastert caves, that's weakness in the face of the enemy.

One thing I would like to know..... When haven't the Republicans shown weakness in the face of the enemy? I'll give the Republicans one more pass this election, but if I don't see results, if the Republicans hold the House and Senate, I'm finished with the Republicans. The Republicans in DC had best wake up and grow a spine, I too am tired of the Republicans caving. I will not continue to vote for people who offer no results.

52 posted on 10/03/2006 5:13:04 AM PDT by From One - Many (Trust the Old Media At Your Own Risk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Taggart_D
Why should he resign?

Didn't you know it is the responsibility of the Speaker of the House to monitor all private emails between members of congress and their pages and to take immediate action in the event there is any inappropriate language?

53 posted on 10/03/2006 5:13:22 AM PDT by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DB

There are legit reasons why Congress should not be allowed to raid the White House. If the reverse is OK, then why not that? I was bewildered at first by Congress' reaction, but there are legitimate Constitutional reasons, having nothing to do with condoning Jefferson.


54 posted on 10/03/2006 5:13:28 AM PDT by PghBaldy (" Surrender NANCY!" What did you and other Dem leaders know and when about Foley???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Taggart_D

The Speaker should not resign. This has nothing to do his record on leading the House - which can be debated. This has to do with Republicans rolling over when there is a "scandal." Why do Republicans fall into the trap of resigning instead of fighting? Why do Democrats get to keep seats, committee assignments, etc. after they are convicted and/or compromised?

This whole Foley thing is a hit job - somone had this information for 3 YEARS and sat on it and the Republicans should go on the offensive to find that person or group. Not only were these person(s) playing a game of "gotcha"- they were putting more pages at risk.

Let's wait and see - I think we will find out the Rats involved and the whole thing will be exposed.


55 posted on 10/03/2006 5:15:23 AM PDT by Cathy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Roccus
Second Amendment solution - what does that mean? If it means what I think, it seems a bit extremem, to say the least.
56 posted on 10/03/2006 5:17:18 AM PDT by PghBaldy (" Surrender NANCY!" What did you and other Dem leaders know and when about Foley???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Roccus
To be totally honest, I'd rather see a Second Amendment solution before the election!

To be totally honest, I took the liberty of forwarding a link to this post to the feds.

57 posted on 10/03/2006 5:20:06 AM PDT by BeHoldAPaleHorse ( ~()):~)>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: wideawake; P-Marlowe; blue-duncan; jude24

If anyone thinks this coming out 30 days before an election is a mere accident, then they are out of touch with political reality in America. This is no accident. The problem apparently had festered and become closet knowledge.

Rather than innoculate themselves against it long ago, the leadership has allowed it to be used against them.

That is either negligence or incompetence....take your pick.

Worse, it plays into democrat hands right at election time, and darned if the democrats aren't the ones who SUPPORT that kind of thing.

The world is upside down where wrong is right and right is wrong.


58 posted on 10/03/2006 5:20:32 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and proud of it! Supporting our troops means praying for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Homer1
No, he should not resign.

He should not run for Leadership again, however.

There is some poetic justice in this, since Hastert now sees the 'gratitude' of the Democrats in his defending Jefferson.

59 posted on 10/03/2006 5:23:30 AM PDT by fortheDeclaration (Am I therefore become your enemy because I tell you the truth? (Gal.4:16))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Taggart_D
It may not be a bad idea. Lets say he announces he is innocent but understands that some folks may doubt this. He steps aside as speaker while the investigation takes place, this defuses the rats, and he stands for re-election in Jan when he is cleared.

This act would stop the possible gains rats could make by ending the newscycle, return the news back to terrorism where we are strongest and raise the bar on ethics for a future rat speaker.
60 posted on 10/03/2006 5:26:30 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-249 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson