Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SolidSupplySide

I think you just flunked reading comprehension. Surely by now, you have read that the emails were investigated, found not to be sexual, and a request was made by the boy's family to drop the investigation. You failed miserably, to use your own words.


86 posted on 10/03/2006 11:07:04 PM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Eva

A gay man buying a 16 year old boy gifts and asking him for photos is a sexual advance. They kid sent the messages to a member of Congress and called them sick. He obviously thought they were sexual.


90 posted on 10/03/2006 11:44:13 PM PDT by Naptowne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

To: Eva

"I think you just flunked reading comprehension. Surely by now, you have read that the emails were investigated, found not to be sexual, and a request was made by the boy's family to drop the investigation. You failed miserably, to use your own words."

I agree. The emails were found according to the FBI not to be criminal. The emails in question were all that Speaker Hastert had at the time and he did the appropriate thing which was to tell Foley to knock it off. Not only that but even the NY Times and several other liberal publications knew about the emails and found them not to be newsworthy.


94 posted on 10/04/2006 12:11:39 AM PDT by LegalEagle61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson