Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jeff Head
I believe they are constrained by securtiy clearance from doing so.

I'm sure they are - as to talking to the media and such.

But that doesn't mean they can't express their opinions or relate them to friends, family or as "unidentified sources" :o)

28 posted on 10/04/2006 9:17:39 AM PDT by maine-iac7 ("...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time." Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: maine-iac7
If you are constrained by a security clearance...you do not speak to anyone of it unless they have the same or higher clearance, and a demonstrable "need to know". Both are required, otherwise you risk significant criminal legal action.

Opinions are one thing...and that is fine...but details of this sort go beyond that. Do not get me wrong, as I stated, I believe this is the case and agree with it. But if we have secret service agents going into this level of detail with their neighbors, they are proving by their own actions, IMHO, that they are a significant security risk themselves.

36 posted on 10/04/2006 9:22:24 AM PDT by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson