Posted on 10/04/2006 10:35:08 AM PDT by Sam Hill
More of the gay activist Mike Rogers' handiwork, from the time of the Senate vote on Alito.
From his site, BlogActive:
Mister Senator...
Monday, January 30, 2006
This post will be read by thousands and thousands of people... It's directed at ONE person.
Mr. Senator:
Tomorrow you will be faced with a vote that may have the longest aftereffects of any other you have cast in your Senate career.
Tomorrow you will decide if your political position is worth more than doing what is right for others like you. For others like you, Mr. Senator, who engage in oral sex with other men. (Although, Mr. Senator, most of us don't do in the bathrooms of Union Station!) Your fake marriage, by the way, will NOT protect you from the truth being told on this blog.
How does this blog decide who to report on? It's simple. We report on hypocrites. In this case, hypocrites who vote against the gay and lesbian community while engaging in gay sex themselves*.
When you cast that vote, Mr. Senator, represent your own...it's the least you could do.
Michael Rogers
blogACTIVE.com*While votes on many matters are considered, votes "FOR" either the Alito nomination and the Federal Marriage Amendment are enough to qualify legislators for reporting on this site.
Ladies and Gentlemen.... if they want a cultural war, I'll give them a fucking cultural war. Fasten your seatbelts, it's gonna be a bumpy 2006.
UPDATE: Some of you have asked if he will be outed tomorrow. No. The blog will report on this closeted Republican Senator between tomorrow and a time when it may most impact the reelection effort of the Senator. Just because the Democratic establishment has given up the fight for our Nation, doesn't mean this site will...By: Michael | permanent link |
Comments (470) | Trackbacks (9)
Notice the spike in traffic this got his site:
And as we know, Mr. Rogers is claiming that Foley is not the end. That others will follow.
This is how the Democrats work -- through blackmail and intimidation. Just like their heroes the terrorists.
They are nothing short of political assassins.
Here's the list of intimidation. He's eliminated some by name and posted a list of 33:
http://web.archive.org/web/20061004175045/http://www.blogactive.com/2006_04_01_blogactive_archive.html
I have no idea, but I wouldn't mind if it were Linseed. I was hoping SC would get rid of him in the next primary, and if it were him, they might not have to. It would explain why he suddenly went wobbly during impeachment--Hillary and her files strike again.
...or even lesbian former first ladies?
I can't believe the blatant blackmail of a United States Senator, even if he isn't specifically named, isn't considered a crime. Paging Attorney General Gonzales..............
"My GAYDAR says it is." Did you get that from Sharper Image or Brookstone?;-)
LAWYER TIME!
If thier was ANY personally delivered threat, doesn't that make this A FEDERAL CRIME?????
More than that, blackmail, or extortion, of a member of Congress to affect their vote is a major felony, with decades of jail time and millions of dollars in fines. If it was done as part of an organized political group that whole group, every member, is liable for criminal charges and all the assets of the group are subject to seizure.
Can you say RICO?
"This is how the Democrats work -- through blackmail and intimidation. Just like their heroes the terrorists....."
BINGO!!! That is the money quote. It shpuld be on EL Rushbo
every 15 minutes until the election.
I wouldn't be surprised to find out that there are more homosexuals hiding in the closets of the house and senate.Would the threat of outing a person be enough to get them to change their party affiliation or vote?This can be just as dangerous and prone to blackmail as a drug habit or other criminal conduct.
Brookstone.
Sharper Image was sold out
Um, didn't we come to that a few years ago? Livingston (I think that's his name), Henry Hyde.
I'm not saying whether Chafee is gay. I was just providing the information that Chafee is the only republican to vote against Alito.
For all I know the guy was just blowing smoke.
In complete agreement on the matter. :-)
Mike Rogers, "Don't throw me in that brier patch."
That is so true. I do think that the media and public took a look at that and decided to back off of that a bit. The problem is I thik we are about to revisit that standard again
Found where he's narrowed the list down to 20:
Friday, June 30, 2006
Oh.... Senator... over here....
I've been unavailable for a few days...deep in research and a short trip. Let's just say I am soooo happy this exists. I doubt the Senator will not be as happy as I am over it though.
Speaking of Senators... Where were we on that list?
He voted against the amendment:
John E. Sununu (R-NH)
And just because I want to narrow the list by a few:
Wayne Allard (R-CO)
Robert F. Bennett (R-UT)
Sam Brownback (R-KS)
Jim Bunning (R-KY)
Richard Burr (R-NC)
Saxby Chambliss (R-GA)
Thad Cochran (R-MS)
Norm Coleman (R-MN)
John Cornyn (R-TX)
Larry E. Craig (R-ID)
Mike Crapo (R-ID)
Jim DeMint (R-SC)
Michael B. Enzi (R-WY)
James M. Inhofe (R-OK)
Johnny Isakson (R-GA)
Mel Martinez (R-FL)
Pat Roberts (R-KS)
Jeff Sessions (R-AL)
Richard C. Shelby (R-AL)
Gordon H. Smith (R-OR)
John Thune (R-SD)
David Vitter (R-LA)
George V. Voinovich (R-OH)
http://www.blogactive.com/2006_06_01_blogactive_archive.html
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.