[PhiKapMom]

Thanks for that analysis. In the meantime the Istook campaign gets tanked. The same Istook who kept Clinton from getting his cushy office and having to settle for one in Harlem.

[NewLand]

I think you're theory is very plausible. Maybe not exact, but in the right direction.

[antceecee]

Geez I thought the Dems were the 'enlightened ones' when it came to treatment of gays?
It seems they are employing 'old school' political blackmail using sexual orientation as the key...
This looks and smells to high heaven or perhaps hell....

[beyond the sea]

Thanks again for reposting your thoughts.

[nopardons]

Good....this did need it's own thread! :-)

[Brad from Tennessee]

As sound a theory as I've seen yet. Good work and please stay on this unraveling circus.

[marsh_of_mists]

How deep and wide is this swamp??

[Judith Anne]

Thanks for this thread.

[carola]

Meanwhile, the identity and age of the IMer, Jordan Edmund, has been on Drudge since last night and none of the MSM are reporting it as far as I can tell. I'm waiting to hear ABC break the story.

[jennyjenny]

They knew it wouldn't be enough for dems to win in November over the Foley fiasco alone. They had to make it look like the leadership was involved in a cover up. Still wondering here about Fordham's role .

[Just mythoughts]

My take is there is a third level or even a primary level player involved and that is the Democratic House leadership, they are not exactly willing to answer any questions about what they knew and when they knew it.