Posted on 10/05/2006 2:45:06 PM PDT by mmyers
How convenient that one of them said that only a matter of hours after Drudge broke that news.
The FBI will be dropping in on ABC for a chat.
Note that they don't even bother to claim that Hastert knew any of this, hoping that the MSM will just continue to conflate everything into one big anti-Republican pogrom.
I guess I must be a member of a real minority... I don't care about Foley or the pages or who plays with who's whatever. It ain't any of my business! On top of that, I still don't really know whether he has a "D" or an "R" after his name and - once again - I don't care! So could we please stop worrying about who he wants to play with and get to something important, like whether or not the Muslims are going to attack us anytime soon?
"Verbal accounts" told me the head of ABC News likes to bugger sheep. See, this "verbal accounts" stuff is bulletproof!
He is only a predator if the pages were underaged. If they were legal adults, then Foley is only guilty of being a creepy middled aged man trying to score with a very young adult, and since the sex lives of consenting adults is no one leses business (thank-you Bill Clinton), there really is nothing to see here.
I bet he sent them all cans of coke also.
Yup, these "journalists" and Demonrats are pure evil. Oh well, what goes around comes around.
No, they are "verbal accounts."
So I can just call and tell them the same thing and they will believe me??
They weren't "boys." They were 18 year old men (2 above, plus Edmund). The last was 17.
All above the age of consent. All of age to enlist in the Marines.
Ever wonder how much money the DNC is paying these little creeps to suddenly come out with this timely information?
ABC still hasn't reported the news that the now identified page has hired a big time defense lawyer.
Sounds like Edmond (the "prankster") was needed to create an IM paper trail to support earlier "verbal" complaints where no paper trail or formal complaints existed.
It is, isn't it? Who, is the story is true, says this isn't a "prank" hours after Drudge unless they've been fed a Dem talking point? I doubt IF true they just accidentally stumbled onto the Drudge report a couple hours ago and innocently chose to use that word.
At very least they've been fed Dem talking points, if it were true.
The base yes. Middle America - maybe not...
This is indeed a scandal, but the whole Hastert thing is a press manufactured secondary scandal to escalate it by the press - the one that carries the most danger.
"It became more weird, and I stopped responding," the page said."
So if he stopped responding when it became more weird then it wasn't weird enough before so what's the problem?
No ages no names etc. They'll be sure to avoid divulging any info that might lead to someone actually checking the 'facts' of their story.
I have no idea what they have. I can't imagine everyone keeps IM's and Emails for years. It seems like a calculated drip drip drip of more stuff on Foley.
There's a former page of 10 years (first name Vivian) that's been out 'shopping' his story here in Atlanta that has a whole line of bullshit. Examination (per the Kimmer here) of the collection of his appearances on shows (radio) yields multiple contradictory points...
The first rule of political naivete that is violated is that most decent, honest, and honorable people (conservative or otherwise) neglect to understand that a damn Democrat WILL LIE, WILL CHEAT, WILL STEAL, WILL TAKE YOUR MONEY, YOUR LIFE and YOUR CHILDRENS' LIVES if you let them, period.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.