Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Phsstpok

Wallace admitted Friday they were still working on the lineup so this isn't a surprise, but thanks for the heads up on who it would be.

One guess is more than a few Democrats want to keep a low profile for tomorrow in light of more truth on Foley coming out.


18 posted on 10/07/2006 8:02:21 AM PDT by Morgan in Denver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: All
Agreed that the Beltway Boys has gotten so predictable it isn't worth the time, and FNW lacks any smidgen of courage. A real examination of BIG media would be worthwhile, but would end party invitations. When the only interesting comments come from Gabler (a liar and a moonbat), it's over.

But there is the JER:They're real focus is American demographics, like Social Security a controversial topic that everyone simply wants to ignore but one which will clearly affect all of our lives far more than almost anything else on the world stage today.

Every thinking person (unfortunately, there are not enough of them) knows Social Security is doomed unless something is done. The President, wisely, wanted to give people the right to keep a small part of the confiscated funds and see how it would work out in the free market. The dems knew that people would like having ownership of some of their money and watching it grow so they couldn't let that happen. If dems ever take charge (please don't let that happen), you will have a reprise of the Clinton's "I had no idea how bad the situation was, and I have no choice but to raise taxes" refrain. And the clobbering of the citizens' pocketbook will be massive.

19 posted on 10/07/2006 9:07:12 AM PDT by Bahbah (Shalit, Goldwasser and Regev, we are praying for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson