Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: B-Chan
"innocent until proven guilty" was still the law the last time I checked"

If he got off on a technicality would he, therefore, be innocent? Was OJ innocent or was he found "not guilty"?

150 posted on 10/07/2006 7:58:27 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: robertpaulsen

Did OJ kill his wife? Almost certainly. But by law he is innocent, and if you or I were to walk up to him and kill him, the law would charge us with murder — and rightly so.

Remember that the purpose of a trial is not to determine the existential guilt of the accused. It is to determine if he has violated the law. Since only God knows everything, a trial before a judge or jury represents a best-we-can-do-as-humans approach to establishing justice under law here on this earth. The power to establish existential justice is reserved to God; therefore, to do more than try people under the law is to play God. This is why I oppose the death penalty except in cases where there is simply no other choice, i.e. when the convicted by his mere existence represents a clear and present danger to the community.

If a man is accused and found innocent at trial, then he is innocent — of breaking the law established by the State. Whether or not he is innocent of violating God's law is a matter best left to God.


153 posted on 10/07/2006 9:01:10 AM PDT by B-Chan (Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson