Skip to comments.
France questions 'failed' Korean nuclear test
The Times ^
| October 11, 2006
| Devika Bhat
Posted on 10/11/2006 2:32:08 PM PDT by MadIvan
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
North Korea may have done the geopolitical equivalent of stuffing a rolled up sock in their underpants.
Regards, Ivan
1
posted on
10/11/2006 2:32:09 PM PDT
by
MadIvan
To: Mrs Ivan; odds; DCPatriot; Deetes; Barset; fanfan; LadyofShalott; Tolik; mtngrl@vrwc; ...
2
posted on
10/11/2006 2:32:35 PM PDT
by
MadIvan
(I aim to misbehave.)
To: MadIvan
I have no more confidence in france then I do in North Korea.
Both lead by dirtbags without a clue. Both antiAmerican.
3
posted on
10/11/2006 2:34:24 PM PDT
by
Joe Boucher
(an enemy of islam)
To: MadIvan
France, experts on small failed explosions.
To: MadIvan
France positioning to cast their veto if the UNSC actions have any hope of working. Damn them!
5
posted on
10/11/2006 2:35:47 PM PDT
by
NonValueAdded
(Treaty Fetishism: "[The] belief that a piece of paper will alter the behavior of thugs." R. Lowry.)
To: MadIvan
And trust me, if there's anyone who knows about military failures, it's the French.
6
posted on
10/11/2006 2:36:25 PM PDT
by
dfwgator
To: MadIvan
Announcing the intention to detonate a nuclear device and then not succeeding in achieving more than a large conventional explosion, it seems to us, is the difference between rape and attempted rape. Both are heinous. One is just not a completed act.
On Wednesday, North Korea's Foreign Ministry said, "If the U.S. keeps pestering us and increases pressure, we will regard it as a declaration of war and will take a series of physical corresponding measures," according to the official Korean Central News Agency.
If their test was not sucessful I am not surprised.
But that doesn't make me feel any safer about the regime either.
To: Joe Boucher
We should believe France's statement...
...for what other country has more experience in failure?
:-P
8
posted on
10/11/2006 2:37:12 PM PDT
by
gogogodzilla
(I criticize everyone... and then breathe some radioactive fire and stomp on things.)
To: MadIvan
Gosh darn it, at first glance the headline looked like
'France questions failed KORAN nuclear test'...
9
posted on
10/11/2006 2:39:37 PM PDT
by
rfp1234
(I've had it up to my keyster with these leaks!!! - - - Ronald Reagan)
To: MadIvan
Leaders in Seoul appeared to have accepted that they will have to live with a nuclear North Korea at least until Washington can be persuaded to engage in direct talks with the isolated Stalinist state.
Yeah, umm, what the heck does Washington have to do with anything? Everybody make nice with each other so we can go home, please?
The real translation is: We long for the day when the United States will again go back to bribing North Korea into acting like civilized people.
10
posted on
10/11/2006 2:41:07 PM PDT
by
kingu
(No, I don't use sarcasm tags - it confuses people.)
To: truth_seeker
Maybe the French know something.
Could some French missiles to Iraq have gone through Iran to KFR?
=========== French missiles FIRST given to Iraq to be USED Against US and Coalition Heroes =========
French missiles found by the Poles, and to protect France, blown up.
Froggies said they did not say "2003". LOL. Decide for yourself.
Iraqi missiles given to, and now located in, Syria:
11
posted on
10/11/2006 2:41:10 PM PDT
by
Diogenesis
(Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
To: MadIvan
North Korea may have done the geopolitical equivalent of stuffing a rolled up sock in their underpants.
And worse yet, putting it in the back...
12
posted on
10/11/2006 2:41:27 PM PDT
by
Paloma_55
(I may be a hateful bigot, but I still love you)
To: gogogodzilla
...for what other country has more experience in failure?
And for their rather extensive knowledge of nuclear weapons, as well as the third largest stockpile of nuclear arms on the planet.
13
posted on
10/11/2006 2:42:16 PM PDT
by
kingu
(No, I don't use sarcasm tags - it confuses people.)
To: MadIvan
France is now asking NK for permission to retract the surrender they issued immediately after the explosion.
14
posted on
10/11/2006 2:42:54 PM PDT
by
Buck W.
(If you push something hard enough, it will fall over.)
To: MadIvan
Everyone has to get on the same page. There was an explosion. North Korea claimed it was nuclear. Regardless of size, the North Korean claim should be accepted and North Korea dealt with harshly and quickly.
To: MadIvan
The more I hear about the NK nuke, the more I am convinced that all they did was surround a quantity of fissionable material with several tons of conventional explosives in hopes that it would work like the real thing. Maybe that's how their schools over there teach it.
16
posted on
10/11/2006 2:45:35 PM PDT
by
Lekker 1
(("...the world will be...eleven degrees colder by the year 2000" -- K. Watt, Earth Day, 1970)
To: backtothestreets
You're right. We aren't gonna do anything about it so what difference does it make? We are going to beg a resolution from the UN and the Chicoms. It is disheartening.
17
posted on
10/11/2006 2:48:26 PM PDT
by
daisyann
To: MadIvan
compress the plutonium and fire a neutron into the mass Aha! So that's how they do it!
18
posted on
10/11/2006 2:53:15 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
To: MadIvan
I wish we were half the bastard the world believes us to be....
Then perhaps we would blow the little North Korean prick to hell, assassinate Chavez, Castro, Assad, al Sadr and the current Iranian chief prick --- then sit back in wonder, denying everything.
Semper Fi
19
posted on
10/11/2006 2:58:28 PM PDT
by
river rat
(You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
To: river rat
If the United States was that much of a bastard, I suggest the terrorists and rogue regimes would be keeping their mouths shut.
Regards, Ivan
20
posted on
10/11/2006 3:00:26 PM PDT
by
MadIvan
(I aim to misbehave.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson