Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Reuters: China reluctant to back Korea sanctions
Reuters ^

Posted on 10/12/2006 7:47:11 AM PDT by quesney

BEIJING - China appeared to shy away Thursday from backing U.S. efforts to impose a travel ban and financial sanctions on North Korea for its claimed nuclear test, saying any U.N. action should focus on bringing its communist neighbor back to talks.

Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Liu Jianchao said North Korea should understand it had made a mistake but "punishment should not be the purpose" of any U.N. response.

U.N. action "should be conducive to the de-nuclearization of the Korean peninsula ... and the resumption of the talks," he told reporters. "It's necessary to express clearly to North Korea that ... the international community is opposed to this nuclear test."

The United States has circulated a new U.N. Security Council resolution that seeks to ban travel by people involved in North Korea's weapons program but softens some other measures to win Russian and Chinese support. North Korea warned it would consider increased U.S. pressure an act of war and take unspecified countermeasures.

China's response to the crisis has been closely watched because it is considered to have the most leverage with the unpredictable, reclusive North Korean regime. China, a veto-wielding Security Council member, is the North's top provider of desperately needed energy and economic aid.

Chinese officials have refused to say publicly what consequences they believe North Korea should face for its claimed nuclear test, although its U.N. ambassador, Wang Guangya, agreed earlier this week that the Security Council must impose "punitive actions."

Japan is imposing its own new sanctions against North Korea. The ruling Liberal Democratic Party approved several harsh measures Thursday, including limits on imports and a ban on all North Korean ships in Japanese waters.

The latest U.S. proposal, obtained by The Associated Press Wednesday night, dropped Japanese demands to prohibit North Koreans ships from entering any port, and North Korean aircraft from taking off or landing in any country. These sanctions would likely face strong Russian and Chinese opposition.

The resolution would still require countries to freeze all assets related to North Korea's weapons and missile programs. But a call to freeze assets from other illicit activities such as "counterfeiting, money-laundering or narcotics" was dropped. So was a call to prevent "any abuses of the international financial system" that could contribute to the transfer or development of banned weapons.

The North will consider increased U.S. pressure "a declaration of war," RI Kong Son, vice spokesman for North Korea's Foreign Ministry, said in an interview with AP Television News in Pyongyang. He said North Korea would take unspecified "physical countermeasures."

Song Il Ho, a North Korean envoy to Japan, gave a similar warning to Tokyo. "We will take strong countermeasures," he told Kyoto News Agency.

Since Pyongyang announced it exploded its first atomic bomb Monday, there have been daily South Korean and Japanese news reports that the North is preparing another test.

On Thursday, the South Korean newspaper Munhwa Ilbo quoted an unidentified source familiar with North Korean affairs as saying a second test would occur in two or three days.

South Korea's National Intelligence Service could not immediately be reached for comment.

South Korean scientists have been scrambling for signs of radioactivity that would confirm Monday's underground test. Han Seung-jae, an official at the Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety, said experts were still unsure the North had tested a nuclear device.

"So far, we have not detected any abnormal level of radioactivity" in South Korea, he said.

Japanese military planes have also been monitoring for radioactivity in the atmosphere but have reported no abnormal readings.

North Korea has been demanding direct talks with the United States, but President Bush refused to agree to such a meeting in a news conference Wednesday. He argued that Pyongyang would be more likely to listen to the protests of many nations.

Bush added that the U.S. was ready to defend its allies in the region, but that it would also try to use diplomacy to deal with North Korea.

"I believe the commander in chief must try all diplomatic measures before we commit our military," he said.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Exactly what have we accomplished listening to either the Russians or the Chinese. Where has it gotten us on North Korea, Iran or a host of other fronts. What are their real interests? Has following their lead improved our security or made us less secure?
1 posted on 10/12/2006 7:47:12 AM PDT by quesney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: quesney

Can someone please tell me what exactly there is to talk about at this point...?


2 posted on 10/12/2006 7:49:27 AM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner ("Si vis pacem para bellum")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quesney

One day, and hopefully not too late, someone is going to wake the hell up and figure out that we are in a new Cold War with Russia and China. It is time we start playing their game, arming Taiwan and Japan and making other moves that will let China know that we are on to them.


3 posted on 10/12/2006 7:51:10 AM PDT by FlipWilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quesney
FGS, China wishes to keep the yuen currency as "is". And, if it does decide to place sanctions on NKorea, it kinda puts them in the "trade arena" as a player: A player who must play by the rules, and not by the rules "China" likes best.

In re your "less or more secure" question -- US Economy has hit historic highs. Unless China agrees to play by the international rules, it is going to lose trade, ultimately. Therefore, the US has done just fine "listening" to Russia and China. Obviously, IMHO.

4 posted on 10/12/2006 7:51:51 AM PDT by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlipWilson

Agree. I'd add that we should either bring Taiwan and Japan into NATO and support their nuclearization, or threaten to do so if this NK issue is not resolved by a date certain. It's time we stop treating these countries as anything close to being allies. They're looking out for themselves and we should be doing the same, along with like minded nations.


5 posted on 10/12/2006 7:52:58 AM PDT by quesney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: quesney

Ignore that man behind the curtain...


6 posted on 10/12/2006 7:58:25 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: quesney

Kick the UN out NOW!


7 posted on 10/12/2006 8:05:21 AM PDT by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner
China...saying any U.N. action should focus on bringing its communist neighbor back to talks.

Yes, we need more diaglogue, debate, discussions, consultations, negotiations, engagement, compromise, and maybe even some new protocols. Give diplomacy a chance. Who knows, it might produce a non-binding resolution!

Geeze, I'm totally sick of this UN crapola.

8 posted on 10/12/2006 8:05:34 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: quesney

The Chi-coms better start reining in pompador boy or the Japanese may soon have their own bomb.


10 posted on 10/12/2006 8:36:56 AM PDT by The Great RJ ("Mir wölle bleiwen wat mir sin" or "We want to remain what we are." ..Luxembourg motto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quesney

11 posted on 10/12/2006 9:41:29 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson