Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iraqi Documents: Projects to Rebuild Saddam Nuclear Facilities (Translation)
Pentagon/FMSO website for Iraq Pre-war documents http://70.168.46.200/ ^ | October 12 2006 | jveritas

Posted on 10/12/2006 8:11:36 AM PDT by jveritas

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last

1 posted on 10/12/2006 8:11:36 AM PDT by jveritas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: eyespysomething

PING


2 posted on 10/12/2006 8:12:12 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Thank you for your continuing effort.


3 posted on 10/12/2006 8:15:05 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (The idea around which liberalism coheres is that NOTHING actually matters except PR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

JV, you are STILL a Great American!


4 posted on 10/12/2006 8:16:19 AM PDT by rightinthemiddle (Without the Media, the Left and Islamofacists are Nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas; Chena; Valin; M. Thatcher; DocRock; Calpernia; Madame Dufarge; Txsleuth; Peach; ...
Thanks, pinging and then reading.

Iraqi Documents: Projects to Rebuild Saddam Nuclear Facilities (Translation)

Release/Translation of Classified PreWar Docs ping. If you want to be added or removed to the ping list, please Freepmail me.

Please add the keyword prewardocs to any articles pertaining to this subject.

Operation Get The Truth Out

Operation Iraqi Freedom Documents

Documents from the Harmony Database

jveritas’s blog

An Interview With a Citizen Translator and American Hero

5 posted on 10/12/2006 8:16:56 AM PDT by eyespysomething
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jveritas; gardencatz

BTTT and a ping!


6 posted on 10/12/2006 8:18:37 AM PDT by KJC1 (Kim Jong Il has a stash of 10,000 bottles of Scotch, partying while his people starve)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Wonderful work as always.

Does anyone actually believe that if there had been no invasion of Iraq and Saddam were still in power, that he would NOT have a full-bore nuclear bomb program right now to compete with that of Iran?

And of course this Iraqi nuclear program would be called by Democrats "yet another Bush administration failure."


7 posted on 10/12/2006 8:19:04 AM PDT by denydenydeny ("We have always been, we are, and I hope that we always shall be detested in France"--Wellington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Further proof that Iraq would be a major thorn in our side without the removal of the Hussein government.

Thanks for the translation.


8 posted on 10/12/2006 8:21:50 AM PDT by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: denydenydeny
Does anyone actually believe that if there had been no invasion of Iraq and Saddam were still in power, that he would NOT have a full-bore nuclear bomb program right now to compete with that of Iran?

Exactly. Saddam was absolutely paranoid with Iran attacking them with Chemical weapons or nuclear weapons so Saddam would not possibly just take a defensive position in this case without being able to hit back with WMD. It was the Chemical Weapons used by Iraq against Iran that made them able to stand against the Iranians and saved Saddam regime during the Iran-Iraq war from 1980 to 1988.

9 posted on 10/12/2006 8:38:09 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
If a country like North Korea can build nuke(s) as cash strapped as it is, what about a country like Iraq under Saddam Hussein, who had extra money to build palaces all over the country with its huge oil revenues?

Thanks for more evidence that Saddam was going for the Mother Lode.

Now I am hearing from my liberal friends that yes Saddam had WMDs, and Bush knew that they were moved out two months before the invasion. When I point out that as easily as they were moved out, they could be moved back in, all of a sudden they go stuck on stupid and start the name calling. Just like you to know.
10 posted on 10/12/2006 8:48:08 AM PDT by jonrick46
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eyespysomething; jveritas

jveritas. You are in a lot of trouble! Don't you know that Saddam never had any interest in nuclear weapons? The NY Times said so and they never lie! So HOW DARE YOU contradict them with these silly little facts! If you don't stop I'm going to be forced to report you to THEM.


11 posted on 10/12/2006 8:48:10 AM PDT by Valin (http://www.irey.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
Important note at the top of the source web page:
At the request of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the US Army Foreign Military Studies Office has created this portal to provide the general public with access to unclassified documents and media captured during Operation Iraqi Freedom. The US Government has made no determination regarding the authenticity of the documents, validity or factual accuracy of the information contained therein, or the quality of any translations, when available. The ODNI press release and public affairs contact information is available at http://www.odni.gov/

12 posted on 10/12/2006 8:49:22 AM PDT by heavy7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Valin

I know that I am in big trouble for challenging the lies of liberals and their media :) but I love this kind of troubles :)


13 posted on 10/12/2006 8:50:39 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jonrick46
I recall reading that Saddam was something like 3 months away from getting rid of the sanctions when we invaded. As I recall the French & Russians were going to get rid of it.
14 posted on 10/12/2006 8:50:49 AM PDT by Valin (http://www.irey.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: heavy7

It is a typical legal disclaimer. There is much lower percentage of fake documents among the millions if Iraqi documents than there are fake news stories and lies printed daily by the liberal media.


15 posted on 10/12/2006 8:52:29 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

You're a baaaad person! I just hope I don't get in trouble for reading these.


16 posted on 10/12/2006 8:52:36 AM PDT by Valin (http://www.irey.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: eyespysomething; jveritas
Thanks for the ping!

You are getting closer J! Tick Tock
Great work by a great American! Thank you so much for your continued dedication to uncovering the lies of the *corrupt regime.

* Saddam, DemonRATS, ENEMEDIA

17 posted on 10/12/2006 8:59:55 AM PDT by Just A Nobody (NEVER AGAIN...Support our Troops! www.irey.com and www.vets4irey.com - Now more than Ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
There is much lower percentage of fake documents among the millions if Iraqi documents than there are fake news stories and lies printed daily by the liberal media.

And another home run, as jveritas hits it outta the park! ;*)

18 posted on 10/12/2006 9:01:30 AM PDT by Just A Nobody (NEVER AGAIN...Support our Troops! www.irey.com and www.vets4irey.com - Now more than Ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Thank you j! The hits just keep on coming!


19 posted on 10/12/2006 9:03:02 AM PDT by A.Hun (Common sense is no longer common.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: heavy7
Hello heavy7, and welcome to FR. The disclaimer has been discussed in much length in the many threads on these documents.

Please feel free to peruse the previous PreWarDoc threads by following this link:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/keyword?k=prewardocs
20 posted on 10/12/2006 9:04:00 AM PDT by eyespysomething
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson