Skip to comments.
Iraqi Documents: Projects to Rebuild Saddam Nuclear Facilities (Translation)
Pentagon/FMSO website for Iraq Pre-war documents http://70.168.46.200/ ^
| October 12 2006
| jveritas
Posted on 10/12/2006 8:11:36 AM PDT by jveritas
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
To: heavy7
Retread or is this your first trolling attempt?
21
posted on
10/12/2006 9:13:39 AM PDT
by
BJClinton
(Celebrate diversity: re-elect Congressman Foley!)
To: jveritas
It is a typical legal disclaimer. There is much lower percentage of fake documents among the millions if Iraqi documents than there are fake news stories and lies printed daily by the liberal media.
What is the error rate from documents on this site? Are there any patters as to what types of documents are more reliable?
22
posted on
10/12/2006 9:15:32 AM PDT
by
heavy7
To: jveritas; eyespysomething
More good work and more evidence that the butcher wasn't just sitting back on his hands and making nice.
Maybe one day the looney left will come to realize that he was trying to rebuild his WMD that he had already used to kill thousands, but I doubt it.
23
posted on
10/12/2006 9:38:14 AM PDT
by
jazusamo
(DIANA IREY for Congress, PA 12th District: Retire murtha.)
To: heavy7
So far, I have read over 40,000 pages of Iraqi documents and only one document ( few pages) sound suspicious.
24
posted on
10/12/2006 10:01:01 AM PDT
by
jveritas
(Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
To: Just A Nobody
When going against the liberal media it is an easy task to hit it out of the park :)
25
posted on
10/12/2006 10:04:01 AM PDT
by
jveritas
(Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
To: jazusamo
But Saddam did not have an atomic bomb when we invaded therefore he was not a danger and Bush lied (Left wing loon opining) :)
26
posted on
10/12/2006 10:05:58 AM PDT
by
jveritas
(Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
To: jveritas; Admin Moderator
27
posted on
10/12/2006 10:07:45 AM PDT
by
bmwcyle
(Only stupid people would vote for McCain, Warner, Hagle, Snowe, Graham, or any RINO)
To: jonrick46
At least some of your liberal friends admit Saddam had WMD, that is some progress.
28
posted on
10/12/2006 10:08:05 AM PDT
by
jveritas
(Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
To: kidd
After 9/11, we simply could not afford to live with Saddam regime, these documents prove it.
29
posted on
10/12/2006 10:09:00 AM PDT
by
jveritas
(Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
To: jveritas
Nice work as always. Imagine if Saddamn was testing Nuclear Weapons?
Pray for W and Our Troops
30
posted on
10/12/2006 10:10:22 AM PDT
by
bray
(Voting for the Rats is Suicide)
To: rightinthemiddle; A.Hun
Just doing my little duty my fellow freepers.
31
posted on
10/12/2006 10:11:08 AM PDT
by
jveritas
(Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
To: jveritas
So far, I have read over 40,000 pages of Iraqi documents...
You deserve the respect and admiration of all Americans for the great effort you have put in to uncover the truth. Thanks!
To: jveritas
33
posted on
10/12/2006 10:14:25 AM PDT
by
1035rep
To: Prokopton
34
posted on
10/12/2006 10:17:30 AM PDT
by
jveritas
(Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
To: bray
Imagine if Saddamn was testing Nuclear Weapons? It would have been a nightmare that exceeds our imagination. The removal of Saddam regime was a great service for the US, Iraq, the world, and all of humanity.
35
posted on
10/12/2006 10:22:00 AM PDT
by
jveritas
(Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
To: jveritas
Thanks for your work. I just sent the documents and translation to the chief editor to a major national newspaper.
36
posted on
10/12/2006 10:22:57 AM PDT
by
tobyhill
(The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
To: tobyhill
Thank you for helping in getting the truth out.
37
posted on
10/12/2006 10:25:51 AM PDT
by
jveritas
(Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
To: jveritas
"So far, I have read over 40,000 pages of Iraqi documents and only one document ( few pages) sound suspicious."
I thought it looked a little suspicious that the first document was numbered 1, 2, 4. What happened to #3?
38
posted on
10/12/2006 10:27:43 AM PDT
by
Tarantulas
( Illegal immigration - the trojan horse that's treated like a sacred cow)
To: jveritas
LOL! Well that is certainly true, but you are certainly a great batter. ;*)
39
posted on
10/12/2006 10:39:33 AM PDT
by
Just A Nobody
(NEVER AGAIN...Support our Troops! www.irey.com and www.vets4irey.com - Now more than Ever!)
To: jveritas
Is his more evidence that the 911 commission and the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence ignored or refused to recognize?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson