Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Soldiers salute General's comments on web forum [British deserting Iraq.]
Times Online ^ | 13OCT06 | Devika Bhat

Posted on 10/13/2006 2:49:42 PM PDT by familyop

The call from General Sir Richard Dannatt that British forces should leave Iraq "sometime soon" has met with overwhelming support on the unofficial Army Rumour Service website, which includes forums where officers can air their views anonymously.

Many express shock about the frankness of his words and there are several references to Sir Richard’s "moral" courage in speaking his mind, as well as calls for the Prime Minister to take heed of his remarks.

"...I am thoroughly heartened by this and have the beginings [sic] of a thaw in the cynicism which has dogged my service thinking since 2003," admits Jim_P_Pulfrew.

"I hope Blair is listening," says user Nigegilb. "Sir Richard has made the call and said it how it is. Good on him. Stand by for incoming. Getting out of Iraq is essential if [Afghanistan] is going to work in the long run. God knows what will happen to Iraq, not sure it will be any worse though. He made the point that we were never invited in we kicked the door in.

Nigegilb asks: "Can someone close to Sir Richard tell him that if he gets sacked he should run for office against whoever is the PM at the time. He will win by a landslide."

"Sir Richard, I'm saluting you right now!," says Purple_Flash. "It's about time someone of your standing actually lived up the Values & Standards that we so often pay lip service to. They are what should make us a breed apart; thank you for walking the walk rather than talking the talk."

Some are less diplomatic in their praise for Sir Richard and criticism of the Government. "He's [Sir Richard] got a hell of a pair of moral b***s on him, I'll give him that! I imagine B'liar is in a bit of a cold sweat/hot rage now," says 303SMLE.

"Politicians can't grasp the idea of someone telling the truth, they'll all just assume he is chasing some kind of agenda. (Arguably, pursuing the truth and bringing the boys home is his agenda!) This might turn out to be one of those moments when the world turns and Governments fall; I certainly hope so!"

Brewmeister adds: "I think even Teflon Tony is going to find it difficult to weasel his way out of this. If Sir Richard goes it's time for a coup."

Stooge notes: "I don't think his comments will 'fall on deaf ears'. I'm pretty sure there are hundreds of people in Whitehall who have by now heard about his comments and panicing [sic]. At the very least some of them will have a sleepless night trying to make this seem less ‘bad’.

"Also, this isn't someone with a political agenda. He's looking out for his own men. Even the public will see that."

It is not just the Government which comes under criticism over Iraq. Hereward says: "A real leader of men has spoken for once. Forget the feeble Mr Cameron and the non-existent Mr Campbell, the general is indeed the true moral voice of opposition in this country."

Many say the comments were long overdue and call for the Army to gather in support of Sir Richard should his position come under threat. "After years and years, AT LAST someone at the top, who makes the headline on the news, has had the b***s to stand up and be counted," says Brandt. "If he gets the sack, watch out for fireworks- If he has had the balls to stand up for us, we should do the same."

DigitalGeek adds: "The General has laid down the gauntlet to the Government. It is now time that we stood behind him." Drop_Short adds: "It is about time that our senior generalship actually stopped being part of the government and stood up for what is in the best interests of the Service. Bring on the revolution"

Even the few users critical of Sir Richard are keen to acknowledge that they agree with his apparent stance on Iraq. PassingBells writes: "Accurate and welcome though these comments are, they are not the sort of remarks that should be made publically [sic]. They are exactly what the CGS [Chief of the General Staff] should be saying privately…I fear that this smacks of naivity [sic] of his behalf and a serious lapse on behalf of his minder(s)."

Most users though, are wholly supportive of the General’s comments. At the time of writing, an ongoing poll on the site claimed that of 126 users, 78 per cent think he is "absolutely right", while only three per cent voted "he had to resign first before making such a statement".


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: british; general; iraq; soldiers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last

1 posted on 10/13/2006 2:49:43 PM PDT by familyop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: familyop

Does anyone in the British military piss standing up anymore?


2 posted on 10/13/2006 2:51:23 PM PDT by Proud_USA_Republican (We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good. - Hillary Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: familyop

The Times, BTW, is one of the more conservative and pro-American papers over there.


3 posted on 10/13/2006 2:51:59 PM PDT by familyop ("he died for rodeo horse on Jul 25, 1987." - - skanamaru)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: familyop
As Britain is close to becoming a Al-Britain this is a good move for them! /S
4 posted on 10/13/2006 2:52:18 PM PDT by rocksblues (Liberals will stop at nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Proud_USA_Republican

I have heard more and more stories of how Politically Correct the British are becoming. I can see it with the French, Scandanavians, etc., but not the British. It's a shame.


5 posted on 10/13/2006 2:55:09 PM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rocksblues

We'll be bleeding again for Europe in the near future...


6 posted on 10/13/2006 2:57:08 PM PDT by MNlurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: familyop

Imagine joining the limey army and getting sent to a war! Jeeze! No wonder they're pissing their pants.


7 posted on 10/13/2006 2:58:37 PM PDT by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: familyop

The British "Army" has ALWAYS been an elitest POS.


8 posted on 10/13/2006 3:01:26 PM PDT by US Navy guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNlurker

No... not this time. Never again. If I could send the last two years worth of information back in time to a pre-WWII US Congress I would.

All this time the US protected Europe from Communism and they all want to go "Communist Lite". Let Europe rot in its socialist malaise. I could care less.


9 posted on 10/13/2006 3:01:26 PM PDT by trashcanbred (Anti-social and anti-socialist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MNlurker

And me and you will be called all kinds of names by the Liberals calling for our intervention in Europe's demise.


10 posted on 10/13/2006 3:01:44 PM PDT by rocksblues (Liberals will stop at nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: familyop

Well, everyone has to make the choice of where they want to stand in this war on terror. The Brits are about to make theirs. We shouldn't be too hard on them. After all we, too, have about 50% of our population who are traitors. I just pray that we have the will and courage to deal with ours and not allow them make the wrong decision for us, as it appears poor England will with theirs.


11 posted on 10/13/2006 3:03:03 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trashcanbred

Socialism breeds mediocrity and nihilism.

But I doubt this is an accurate picture.


12 posted on 10/13/2006 3:07:38 PM PDT by Red6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: familyop

Blair will be leaving soon. I wonder whether General Sir Richard cleared this with Gordon Brown before making his statement? If so, I would have thought they would at least have waited for Blair to leave office.


13 posted on 10/13/2006 3:07:53 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

If anyone cares to read what he says - he wants more people in Afghanistan to destroy Al Qaeda, rather than prop up a three sided civil war with our own dead.


14 posted on 10/13/2006 3:09:48 PM PDT by Jack2006
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: US Navy guy

Does POS mean what I think it does?


15 posted on 10/13/2006 3:11:31 PM PDT by Jack2006
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: familyop
Getting out of Iraq is essential if [Afghanistan] is going to work in the long run.

We throw in the towel in Iraq, how long does anybody think we'll stand the gaff in Afghanistan?

16 posted on 10/13/2006 3:13:24 PM PDT by Argus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red6
"Socialism breeds mediocrity and nihilism."

...related? And actually, the English girl was arrested for only asking the teacher if she could sit with other English-speaking students.

Schoolgirl arrested for refusing to study with non-English pupils
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1718345/posts
17 posted on 10/13/2006 3:16:45 PM PDT by familyop ("he died for rodeo horse on Jul 25, 1987." - - skanamaru)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: familyop

...initial story (before newer details).

(British) General Seeks UK Iraq Withdrawal
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1718406/posts

...and politically related.

Brit foreign secretary slams terror suspects' detention
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1718407/posts


18 posted on 10/13/2006 3:19:23 PM PDT by familyop ("he died for rodeo horse on Jul 25, 1987." - - skanamaru)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack2006
Yes it does. The British Army AND The French Army was directly responsible for the WASTE of human live in Battle after Battle in WW1(US Army Gen Pershing's was responsible for saying the the British HELL NO) AND there was Gen Montgomery who was responsible for the FAILED Battle at Arnhem. At least we (sometimes) learn lessons from past mistakes.
19 posted on 10/13/2006 3:23:33 PM PDT by US Navy guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: US Navy guy

To call the British Army POS is simply disgusting and urinates on the memory of all the young men and women who have given their lives in Afghanistan and Iraq.


20 posted on 10/13/2006 3:25:56 PM PDT by Jack2006
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson