Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TrebleRebel
Of course, Ed Lake simply denies that the JLo letter did contain anthrax.

I don't "simply deny" it. I provide the facts and evidence which clearly says that J-Lo letter did NOT contain anthrax:

1. According to AMI's #1 newspaper, The National Enquirer, the J-Lo letter was opened on the third floor. According to the CDC, the third floor is the least contaminated floor in the building. The link to their report is HERE.

2. Bobby Bender, who is the person who opened the J-Lo letter, was not one of those contaminated by anthrax.

3. Bender carried the opened J-Lo letter all around the third floor, yet that floor was the least contaminated floor and he was not contaminated.

4. Stephanie Dailey, the person who opened the REAL anthrax letter and was contaminated by the REAL anthrax letter, was on vacation when the J-Lo letter was opened, so she could not have been contaminated by the J-Lo letter.

5. The area where Stephanie Daily opened the REAL anthrax letter was the MOST contaminated area in the AMI building.

For anyone to believe the J-Lo letter contained anthrax, they must totally ignore the FACTS.

Ed

136 posted on 10/18/2006 11:21:31 AM PDT by EdLake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies ]


To: EdLake
"Stephanie Dailey, the person who opened the REAL anthrax letter and was contaminated by the REAL anthrax letter..."

No anthrax letter was ever recovered from Stephanie's mail, or Bob Steven's mail, or from any AMI mail.

It is therefore **undetermined** if the AMI infections were from the mail. Infections can come from other sources (e.g. cash, contact with the terrorists, etc.).

There was and is no known "real anthrax letter" sent to AMI.

138 posted on 10/18/2006 11:27:00 AM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]

To: EdLake

Incredible, you cite the CDC article as your authority that the JLo letter didn't contain anthrax, and yet that article concludes it DID contain anthrax! You should work for the FBI. I seem to remember they recently published a paper citing an article in Science magazine as authority that the spores contained no additives, when the Science article actually stated the spores DID contain additives. And we all know the FBI lab's reputation for honesty and integrity.

http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/EID/vol8no10/02-0354.htm

The index patient’s infection most likely occurred from inhalation of B. anthracis spores following a primary aerosolization, i.e., spores released into the air after opening a spore-containing letter. This scenario is consistent with co-workers’ recollections that the index patient held a letter containing powder over his computer keyboard, as well as environmental samples showing contamination at his keyboard, an incoming-mail desk near his workspace, and his mailroom mailbox.


140 posted on 10/18/2006 11:31:44 AM PDT by TrebleRebel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]

To: EdLake
For anyone to believe the J-Lo letter contained anthrax, they must totally ignore the FACTS.

Did you happen to be paying attention to the news several days ago when the Yankees pitcher crashed his airplane into the building?

I know this may seem like a ridiculous question from out of the blue, but bear with me here for a moment, I'm asking for a serious reason.

141 posted on 10/18/2006 11:45:16 AM PDT by jpl (Victorious warriors win first, then go to war; defeated warriors go to war first, then seek to win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson