Republican Gays are Closeted Dems

Chronwatch ^ | October 12, 2006 | Cliff Kincaid

[CBart95]

I hesitate to reply understanding your fury over all this deplorable conduct.

It is so entirely outrageous but at the same time outside our ability to directly influence that it is really an enormous waste of time to stew and fulminate over.

Have faith my friend that these misdeeds will bear bitter fruit and just rewards for the miscreants that commit them. ( look how perfectly John Kerry was dealt out of the game in '04!... and it felt like this monster might actually be in the running.)

Your love for our homeland is admirable...as is your fire.

Have faith in America.

[lentulusgracchus]

The Foley topic makes them very uncomfortable. When one tries the standard Dim line about sexual predators, you can just see the eyes flying open, and the faces reddening across the bar.

Interesting reaction, but what do you think they really think? Are they to the left of you and reacting to a "provocation" by a known right-winger? ("Provocation" is a favorite old Pravda chestnut.)

Or are they annoyed by Foley and his behavior, or annoyed by what the Dems are doing? These are leftists, as you describe them. Leftists have a very long history of complete toleration of sexual deviancy, going back to the Bolshevik Revolution and the Nazi bigwigs who used to use the Hitler Youth as their boy-toy seraglio. They may be nowhere near as square-rigged as you evidently hope they are.

[lentulusgracchus]

Ping, pang, pung

I think my bell got rung.

;)

[little jeremiah]

I have found that non-homosexuals who rabidly support sexual anything-goes are often just as outraged if not more so over the slightest hint of criticism leveled at the "gay" agenda as practicing homosexuals.

I think a lot of leftists are just clawing the air right now, naturally with spittle flying.

[AmericaUnite]

Sounds like they knew the Republicans were electable. And like manipulative spouse thought that her man could be changed. Or as a gold digger as long she can run around behind his back & still have the $$ she's set. What users.

[RegulatorCountry]

Most of the people there know I'm conservative. I broached the topic on purpose, to gauge reaction. All I asked was "what do you think of this whole Foley thing, isn't it rather dangerous for Democrats to be attacking gays, a core Democrat constituency, on an ideological basis?" One of the bar patrons launched into a tirade about how "closet" gays are all perverts, and that Republicans were "protecting" a sexual predator and child molester, which was intended to upset me, but I just shook my head and said nothing. A couple of others made comments about not making statements stereotyping gays. Most just got wide-eyed or turned red, and would not comment on the matter, which is rather unusual there.

[Grampa Dave]

The wonders of Botox ODing.

[Grampa Dave]

"Actually, to be a little more precise, she will be second in line - -First in line - the Vice-President, second in line - the Speaker of the House!"

That is even scarier!

[thegreatbeast]

You're not very bright, are you?
This happens to be one of the more obvious "lesser evils" that many of us are tired of voting for. Do you want to try to tell me that Pepublicans have been strong on opposing gay marriage, keeping gays out of Scout leadership, indoctrination through the educational system and assigning special protections to sexual preference groups? Good Lord, man, get you head out of your ...

[bwc]

.. is not only unethical politically but also morally.

Morally? How do you decide what is moral and what is not moral? I really would like to know.

[Grampa Dave]

The joke is your rant.

[Just mythoughts]

Do not remember if Cliff Kincaid is on the list of individuals you have sent your discoveries to, but considering he is thinking outside the box, so to speak, he might find what you discovered of interest.

[jpl]

It's highly foolish to ever trust a queer, for a variety of reasons. Our government used to understand this, until the recent pinking of America.

[Wormwood]

It's highly foolish to ever trust a queer, for a variety of reasons.

Such as?

[penelopesire]

That might be a good idea. I actually haven't personally sent the stuff to anyone but the FBI, Hastert's office, my attorney(grin) and friends and family.
I think some others have sent it around though. Somebody's following it...the thread has gotten over 4500 views at last count.

[F.J. Mitchell]

Speaking of which. Has anybody heard a peep from those "Log" Cabin Republicans lately? Ya gotta wonder if the heat of their zeal for Conservative causes set the cabin on fire, or if their mission to neutralize the Republican party is completed and they returned to Home base over at the DNC.

[Just mythoughts]

So WHO sent the emails or IM's to the press? I have yet to hear the press identify either party, the sender or receiver as responsible. Was somebody computer SPYING for the purpose of political gains????

I am what these that sought to used Foley's activities as method and means to OFFEND, what is described as the "morals voters" into staying home. So who stands to gain from that offense?

See the OFFENSE to me is NOT the perverted gutter chat, (I have not nor do I neeeeed to read the sordid chat) but that the "morals voters" have once again gotten that slap across the other cheek for NOT protecting the children from perverts.

We "morals voters" have followed the military policy of "DON'T ASK - DON'T TELL", yet here we are alll these many years later getting the SEX crazed element thrown in our faces for NOT protecting the children.

You describe seeking to read to understand both parties important political topics, well guess what we who have NOT been "ASKING" or "TELLING" have been forced into READING with understanding what this sex crazed mentality is alllllllllllllll about. IT IS NOT A PRETTY PICTURE!!!!!