Skip to comments.
Is it Time to Consider Killing Crazy Kim?
Yale Daily News ^
| October 13, 2006
| Austen Kassinger
Posted on 10/14/2006 1:28:55 PM PDT by Arec Barrwin
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
To: Arec Barrwin
2
posted on
10/14/2006 1:29:46 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(If stupidity got us into this mess, then why can't it get us out?)
To: Arec Barrwin
I think 1993 was a good time to start thinking about it.
To: cripplecreek
Is it Time to Consider Killing Crazy Kim? YES!!!!
4
posted on
10/14/2006 1:45:16 PM PDT
by
YdontUleaveLibs
(Reason is out to lunch. How may I help you?)
To: Arec Barrwin
He's a mad dog who will sell weapons to our enemies. A sniper shot is well justified..
5
posted on
10/14/2006 1:45:51 PM PDT
by
vietvet67
To: Arec Barrwin
National leaders are always against killing other national leaders, because they don't want to become targets themselves. They'd rather send millions of kids to be killed in wars. In Kim's case, I'd think the whole world would be glad to make an exception.
To: Arec Barrwin
should of done it when mad albright was doing her little dance over there
7
posted on
10/14/2006 1:56:02 PM PDT
by
ustanker
(kennedy is a moron)
To: Arec Barrwin
I think it should be left to the Chinese.
8
posted on
10/14/2006 1:57:13 PM PDT
by
Cowboy Bob
(Liberalism in a parasite that ALWAYS kills its host.)
To: Arec Barrwin
It was time the day after his crazy daddy died.
9
posted on
10/14/2006 1:58:12 PM PDT
by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
To: Arec Barrwin
A nuke would be a good message to certain nations in the world right now.
World: "We hate to use these nucular bombs, yes we really do. But there are times and situations, such as this one, that require the complete desolation of major cities. We really, really, really, didn't like having to do it."
10
posted on
10/14/2006 2:00:21 PM PDT
by
gotribe
(It's not a religion.)
To: Arec Barrwin
YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
To: Cowboy Bob
Probably the only ones who could pull it off, don't see how U.S. could get close enough.
To: Arec Barrwin
Wait just a minute. Did Pat Robertson write this article?
13
posted on
10/14/2006 2:02:16 PM PDT
by
Popman
("What I was doing wasn't living, it was dying. I really think God had better plans for me.")
To: caresistance
Probably the only ones who could pull it off, don't see how U.S. could get close enough. China can call him to Beijing for "consultations," and Kim can suffer a "heart attack" on the way. I don't think the world would mind.
14
posted on
10/14/2006 2:17:24 PM PDT
by
Cowboy Bob
(Liberalism in a parasite that ALWAYS kills its host.)
To: Arec Barrwin
Only thing I would disagree with is "I am not suggesting that we shoot Kim tomorrow..."
15
posted on
10/14/2006 2:30:03 PM PDT
by
omega4412
(Multiculturalism kills. 9/11, Beslan, Madrid, London)
To: Arec Barrwin
You don't have to assassinate Kim, just put him on the same diet he keeps the population of North Korea on and in a short amount of time he'll starve to death like millions of his countrymen have !!!
16
posted on
10/14/2006 2:30:47 PM PDT
by
Obie Wan
To: Cowboy Bob
Works for me!! Although, I think the Chinese like seeing U.S. preoccupied with global events, allows them to roll us on trade relations. That would explain them opposing U.S. sanctions at the U.N. yesterday.
To: Cowboy Bob
South Korea is still technically at war with North Korea. It would not be against the laws of warfare if a R.O.K. soldier put Lil' Kim in the cross-hairs.
18
posted on
10/14/2006 2:31:45 PM PDT
by
Mojave Mark
(The Democrats... gravitas free since '63)
Comment #19 Removed by Moderator
To: Arec Barrwin
20
posted on
10/14/2006 2:33:13 PM PDT
by
Zeroisanumber
(Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson