Posted on 10/16/2006 12:30:34 PM PDT by presidio9
Senator Hillary Clinton has said that she supports legalizing the torture of a captured terror suspect who knows abut "an imminent threat to millions of Americans".
This, she said was an exception to her opposition to torture.
"If we're going to be preparing for the kind of improbable but possible eventuality, then it has to be done within the rule of law," the New York Daily News quoted Hillary as saying in a phone interview on Friday.
She said the "ticking time bomb" scenario represented a narrow exception to her opposition to torture as morally wrong, ineffective and dangerous to American soldiers.
"In the event we were ever confronted with having to interrogate a detainee with knowledge of an imminent threat to millions of Americans, then the decision to depart from standard international practices must be made by the President, and the President must be held accountable," she said.
"That very, very narrow exception within very, very limited circumstances is better than blasting a big hole in our entire law," she added.
Another lurch to the right in hopes of a few more votes...
She's right about torturing suspects to prevent an imminent attack, obviously.
But that's not a very hard one, is it?
Senator Hillary Clinton has said that she supports legalizing the torture of a captured terror suspect who knows abut "an imminent threat to millions of Americans".
How about to 50 Americans?
Is this a hoax? I can't believe she'd risk alienating her moonbat base with this position.
She is going to kill her nomination if she keeps this up. And, meanwhile, it's not like she's picking up any national security/terrorism votes anyway.
Using cigars I presume.
Having them listen to her speeches ought to do it.............
Yeah but she's not supposed to make that lurch until after securing her party's nomination.
Just the ones who are willing to say Bush is at fault for all things great and small.
[CASH] "I walk the line.... [/CASH]
Pardon my language but what a Whore!
I want to know what her definition of torture is. What, specifically, constitues torture and what methods would she allow. Also, what is the threshhold for the number of citizens who will be killed before she will allow this "torture"?
Wow. Are her numbers down or what? She sounds desperate.
Pardon my language but what a Whore!
WOW....she must be desperate. Now I'm convinced she's running.....GOod LOrd help us.

William Barkley
Gandy Baush
Mike Boorda
Ron Brown
James Bunch
Eric Butera
William Colby
Suzanne Coleman
Gregory Collins
Keith Coney
William Densberger
Steve Dickson
Daniel A. Dutko
Cpl. Eric S. Fox
Vincent Foster
Hershell Friday
Kathy Furguson
Robert G. Damus
Carlos Ghigliotti
Judy Gibbs
Paula Grober
Brian Haney
Stanley Heard
Don Henry
Lance Herndon
Stanley Huggins
Sandy Hume
Kevin Ives
Niko Jerkuic
Robert Kelly
Shelly Kelly
Jordan Kettleson
Johnny Laughton
Larry Lawrence
Conway LeBleu
Mary Mahoney
Florence Martin
James McDougal
Keith McKaskle
Todd McKechan
Charle Meissner
James Milam
Charles Wibourne Miller
Ron Miller
John Millis
Niel Moody
Darlene Novinger
Paul Olson
Jerry Parks
Jon Parnell Walker
Montgomery Raisner
C. Victor Raisner II
Scott Reynolds
Gary Rhodes
Jeff Rhodes
William Robertson
Dr. Ronald Rogers
Tim Sabel
James Sabow
Captain Schic
Berry Seal
Bill Shelton
Paul Tully
Calvin Walraven
Maynard Webb
Alan G. Whicher
Paul Wilcher
Jim Wilhite
Ed Willey
Robert Williams
Theodore Williams Jr.
Steve Wills
Richard Winters
Barbera Wise
Terrance Yeakey
How about 3,000 or 10,000 or 50,000 or 100,000 or 500,000 Americans??
How about the obvious FACT that usually/always we don't enjoy the convenient certainties of knowing what such hypotheticals assume? How about the FACT that Hillary and Bill are slimy weasels who understand nothing except their own political fortunes...???
When she gets the nomination, liberal moonbats are going to stay away in droves or vote third party.
Let's face it. Hillary Clinton would support the selective torture of anyone of us that would dare speak out against her.
I wonder what her definition of torture would be? If its anything like Bill's definition of sex then the terrorists have nothing to fear.
Her liberal friends all know that she says these things in hopes of getting elected and she is not serious and for them, thats OK.
So, I guess Hillary thinks torture should be common, normalized, and funded by tax dollars.
hummmmm wonder if she would like to try all her ideas on bj.....
do you suppose she still has bj's testicles in her lock box?????
Hillary scares me. One of the reasons I've had some doubts about Pres. Bush's proposals to protect us from terrorists is that he and the Republicans will not always be in the WH. I trust Pres. Bush completely, but memories of the Clintons always worried me. This brings it all back. I don't want Hillary in charge if any torture anywhere is allowed. These people do away with their opposition. And they consider Republicans--or anyone in the way of their ambitions--their enemies. They seem much more comfortable aligning themselves with people Republicans and patriots know are our enemy.
She's be the Dem. equivilant of Saddam Hussein.
Agreed, and that is why she still the left wing liberal clown that she is. We need to use rough interrogation measures with terrorists to get information period, and it does not need to be only in the case of imminent threat to millions of Americans as Hillary Clinton is saying. How about a captured terrorists with information about a plot to kill 50 Americans or even one American a year from now, should not we use rough interrogation with them in this case? Of course we should.
By which she means: "People working for her 2008 Primary opponents." ;)
"Senator Hillary Clinton has said that she supports legalizing the torture of a captured terror suspect who knows abut "an imminent threat to millions of Americans".
.......does that include HER?
I should have read your post before I posted mine :), agreed 100%.
Hillary has been torturing us with her presence since 1991. Why would she want to give that up?
"As soon as you start talking, we'll take the black pantsuit out of your air vent to your cell...."
Now we can find out the facts about Vince Fostera and Ron Brown.
Standard international practices? Has this foolish woman ever seen the inside of, say, a Jordanian jail or a Cuban or a Chinese one? In most of the world, what the liberals would consider "torture" is standard practice - and that's if the prisoner's lucky.
How long before Chris Wallace is on this list?
I suspect that the only people HiLIARy wants to see tortured are political opponents who still resist after she sics the IRS on them.
I am all for selective torture, but even I would object to subjecting anyone to Mrs. Bill Clinton in the nude.
Torture as punishment is never acceptable. Torture of a bad guy as an instrument for saving the life of a good guy is always acceptable.
Just have the prisoner spend a night with Hillary--that'll be torture enough.

Clinton, the Terrorist Enabler: "If you or anyone else dares to damage my legacy,
we shall either use our FBI files on you, or treat you to three words from my wife."
only if they are female
she killed all those people? /s ?
"Her liberal friends all know that she says these things in hopes of getting elected and she is not serious and for them, thats OK."
Ding ding ding...We have a winner!

'Hillary' and 'torture' in the same sentence is rather pleonastic.
i don't think the chief interrogator has had any experience with men. i may be wrong.
Yes....she will fight like HECK to keep President Bush from having any of the "power" of a POTUS/CIC....but, she also is making it clear that "when" she is POTUS/CIC....SHE will not be held to the same standards!!!
Plus, she HAS to get closer to the middle....
What a phoney beeeeatch.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.