Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Henry Wilson

I'm the guy who did this poll and wrote the text reproduced in the above post. The "likely voter model" did not change. It was exactly the same model as we used in the previous poll. We do not "weight to party", we rely on self-described party affiliation (NOT registration), and we saw that more people were identifying themselves as Democrats and fewer as Republicans. It's not a "model", or something we put in to the data -- it's what we observed while using the exact same methodology as before.

Not good news for the GOP I'm afraid, but there's still plenty of time for things to change.


10 posted on 10/16/2006 5:28:08 PM PDT by VeritatisSplendor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: VeritatisSplendor

Ans what was your participation rate for the poll(i.e how many phone calls did yu have to make to get 1 response) and what were the actual dates of the poll.


12 posted on 10/16/2006 5:31:24 PM PDT by Dane ("Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall" Ronald Reagan, 1987)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: VeritatisSplendor

Thanks for posting here. Is the release of the Hayworth and Bilbray polls imminent or do we wait until tomorrow?


13 posted on 10/16/2006 5:32:03 PM PDT by HostileTerritory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: VeritatisSplendor
We do not "weight to party", we rely on self-described party affiliation (NOT registration), and we saw that more people were identifying themselves as Democrats and fewer as Republicans.

That usually happens on weekend polls.

18 posted on 10/16/2006 5:38:38 PM PDT by Dane ("Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall" Ronald Reagan, 1987)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: VeritatisSplendor
How do you rule out that the party self-identification change is because poll respondents- not the electorate- are less likely to be Republican?

IE: that Republicans are not reached or refuse to respond (especially with automated polls).

20 posted on 10/16/2006 5:39:32 PM PDT by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: VeritatisSplendor

I am impressed with your credentials. Way to go!


25 posted on 10/16/2006 5:50:47 PM PDT by Kay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: VeritatisSplendor
Wow, cool. Even if it's bad news, it's just strange to feel I can finally trust a poll - lol!
31 posted on 10/16/2006 5:54:06 PM PDT by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: VeritatisSplendor

Hmmm, that's actually what I meant - the demographic support for each candidate remained the same in the two polls. It was the composition of likely voters that changed. Not really surprising, given all the gloomy and bad news being reported. The Republican base is depressed.


34 posted on 10/16/2006 6:02:52 PM PDT by Henry Wilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: VeritatisSplendor

I believe that you believe that what you do is a "science".
And I believe that you are serious about your work.
But let me tell you what happened to me the other day.

Honest to God's truth.

A pollster calls me on the phone and says,
"Are you pleased or displeased with the job President Bush is doing?"
I said,
"Well, that is a pretty complex question to answer with a simple 'yes' or 'no'."
He said, "Thank you", and hung up the phone.

Now you tell me.
Were his results valid at the end of the day?


74 posted on 10/16/2006 7:24:01 PM PDT by Repeal The 17th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: VeritatisSplendor
Not good news for the GOP I'm afraid, but there's still plenty of time for things to change.

The funny thing is that this has been the battle cry for almost a year now. Nothing much has changed.

76 posted on 10/16/2006 7:28:43 PM PDT by HitmanLV ("If at first you don't succeed, keep on sucking until you do succeed." - Jerry 'Curly' Howard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: VeritatisSplendor

Judging by the Excel spreadsheets at the SurveyUSA website, you do damn good work. Thanks for that analysis. Now I've got something to judge other polls by.


83 posted on 10/17/2006 5:14:28 AM PDT by DaGman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: VeritatisSplendor
Did you factor in the voter fraud by the democrat SOS? I am very pessimistic about ANY Republican winning in NM this election, except possibly Domenici. Just one of the most recent stories about the people that count the votes here at

Albuquerque Journal "Bernalillo County Clerk Mary Herrera was unaware that a man hired as elections coordinator by her office was under investigation for embezzling money at the Grant County Clerk's Office.......

90 posted on 10/17/2006 5:31:45 PM PDT by greyfoxx39 (Clinton's FBI, media whores and judges are working overtime to defeat the Republicans in November.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson