Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Britain: 2 terror suspects on the run
AP ^ | Oct. 16, 2006 | David Stringer

Posted on 10/16/2006 7:25:00 PM PDT by Alouette

LONDON - Two suspected terrorists who were being detained under strict conditions resembling house arrest have escaped and are now on the run, officials said Monday.

An unidentified British man accused of trying to travel to Iraq to fight alongside insurgents is thought to have fled through a window of London mental health unit two weeks ago.

Officials said a second suspect — an Iraqi — also was on the run and that he had escaped several months ago.

Policing minister Tony McNulty said the government had not publicly revealed details of the escapes — nor the fact that there had been any escapes — because anti-terrorism legislation prevents the suspects' identities from being revealed.

He also rejected concerns that the two men posed a danger to the public, or could mount a terrorist attack against Britain.

"People who needed to know, in the context or public safety, did know," McNulty told the British Broadcasting Corp.

Both were being detained under so-called "control orders," which British authorities have used to restrict the activities of terror suspects who are not charged with any offenses but deemed a risk to national security.

The contentious measures allows suspects to be electronically tagged, kept under curfew, denied the use of telephones or the Internet and barred from meeting outsiders.

A government official, who was not authorized to discuss the matter and spoke on condition of anonymity, said the British man was being held at a mental health unit for an assessment, not as part of the control order.

The official also confirmed a second suspect was missing after breaching the terms of his control order.

London's Metropolitan police said officers were investigating the reports.

Britain's Home Office, responsible for the control order regime, said it could not discuss details of the cases, but confirmed 15 terrorism suspects — six of whom are British — are being held under control order powers.

Prime Minister Tony Blair's government devised control orders after courts ruled that suspected terrorists could not be locked up indefinitely without being charged.

Senior opposition Conservative lawmaker David Davis said the escapes undermined a crucial plank of Britain's anti-terrorism legislation.

"The government justified control orders on the basis of protecting the public from potentially dangerous terrorists. It is therefore hard to understand how this man was allowed to escape, especially while under going psychiatric assessment," David said in a statement.

Opposition Liberal Democrat lawmaker Nick Clegg said: "Since control orders were the government's flagship anti-terrorism measure, this is a huge embarrassment for them."


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: terror; uk

1 posted on 10/16/2006 7:25:01 PM PDT by Alouette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 1st-P-In-The-Pod; A_Conservative_in_Cambridge; af_vet_rr; agrace; albyjimc2; Alexander Rubin; ...
FRmail me to be added or removed from this Judaic/pro-Israel/Russian Jewry ping list.

Warning! This is a high-volume ping list.

2 posted on 10/16/2006 7:25:30 PM PDT by Alouette (Psalms of the Day: 113-118)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alouette

A headstart maybe? Literally.


3 posted on 10/16/2006 7:26:44 PM PDT by The_Englishman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

FYI


4 posted on 10/16/2006 7:29:53 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (Second to none!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Alouette

anti-terrorism legislation prevents the suspects' identities from being revealed.

Idiots


5 posted on 10/16/2006 7:30:34 PM PDT by MindBender26 (Having my own CAR-15 in RVN meant never having to say I was sorry....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alouette

"...detained under strict conditions resembling house arrest..."

Anybody see a contradiction in terms here?


6 posted on 10/16/2006 8:34:34 PM PDT by happyathome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: happyathome

"...detained under strict conditions resembling house arrest..."
"Anybody see a contradiction in terms here?"

Yes I do...


7 posted on 10/17/2006 3:21:42 AM PDT by Dakara Yakah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson