Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rembrandt_fan

It sounds as if the scene --- with the non-reacting people -- was meant to titillate if not outright gratify.

There has been a whole rash of novels with pedophilic themes in them, to the point where it has become fashionable. It's called 'edgy', 'dark' and other cliches. White Oleander comes to mind, and for my money, Lolita goes inthe same category.

I can't imagine this scene being other than gratiuitous and aimged at pedophiles.

when a scene and characters don't make sense and seem highly improbable, when there are no consequences of such an act you're dealing with pornography.

Where are the consequences? Does the narrative follow the brutalized child and describe his/her terror, feeling of violation?

No? Porn fantasy.


17 posted on 10/17/2006 10:13:27 AM PDT by squarebarb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: squarebarb
>>>Lolita goes inthe same category.

Hah. Don't make a fool of yourself. Have you read Lolita?

61 posted on 10/26/2006 5:16:04 PM PDT by oblomov (Join the FR Folding@Home Team (#36120) keyword: folding@home)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: squarebarb

Lolita isn’t pornographic. It doesn’t contain any descriptions of sex.


108 posted on 06/11/2010 11:58:31 AM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson