To: VadeRetro
Darn, I can't use it 'cuz (from my quick reading) Mehlert was referring to the WT-15000 ("Turkana Boy") fossil, & the survey is referring to the D2700 fossil. But Mehlert does seem to be saying that all Homo erectuses are just short examples of Homo sapiens. So whaddya think? Is it fair to mark him (& DLR by reference) for number G being "just an old human"?
59 posted on
10/19/2006 3:34:03 PM PDT by
jennyp
(There's ALWAYS time for jibber jabber!)
To: DaveLoneRanger
Dave, I don't have you down for any definitive statements on these fossils. Since you are making the case that there are no transitional ape-human fossils, care to join in & say specifically which ones are just an ape vs. just a human?
60 posted on
10/19/2006 3:36:14 PM PDT by
jennyp
(There's ALWAYS time for jibber jabber!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson