Posted on 10/20/2006 8:32:05 PM PDT by bnelson44
see Enterprise's post, also found at #107:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I don't consider this to be anything necessarily new. I, and others, have suspected the Democrats of undermining this nation in order to achieve and maintain political power for decades. So my questions would along these lines:
1. How many Democrat politicians in general have been in communications with foreign leaders, their intelligence agencies, their diplomats, or their news agencies, or have been leaking information to these entities, with the intent to undermine a Republican Presidency? How long has this been going on?
2. How many Democrat politicians who have been serving on United States intelligence committees have been in communications with foreign leaders, their intelligence agencies, their diplomats, or their news agencies, or have been leaking sensitive information to these entities, with the intent to undermine a Republican Presidency? How long has this been going on?
3. How many Democrats, who work for Democrat politicians, have been in communications with foreign leaders, their intelligence agencies, their diplomats, or their news agencies, or have been leaking sensitive information to these entities, with the intent to undermine a Republican Presidency? How long has this been going on?
4. How many Democrats, who are employed by the intelligence agencies, have been in communications with foreign leaders, their intelligence agencies, their diplomats, or their news agencies, or have been leaking sensitive information to these entities, with the intent to undermine a Republican Presidency? How long has this been going on?
5. How many Democrat politicians, their employees, and Democrats who work for the intelligence agencies have been leaking information to United States media, with the intent to undermine a Republican Presidency, or with the intent to have the U.S. Media covertly pass the information on to contacts in foreign governments? How long has this been going on?
6. As Doctor Raoul's post reminds me - How many Democrat politicians, their employees, democrats working for the intelligence agencies, and media employees are currently communicating with terrorist organizations in an effort to undermine a Republican Presidency? How long have you people been doing this?
An investigation and retribution is long overdue for those who have been engaging in these activities.
107 posted on 10/21/2006 12:57:54 PM EDT by Enterprise
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Very thorough. Nothing that Kennedy or any other DIM does would surprise me. Frighten me, yes....surprise me, no.
God help this country if they win the majority back.
Ping...interesting and frightening, too.
The media did everything they could to shill for a nuclear freeze in 1983-84, producing garbage like "The Day After."
They told us Mondale would win until the day before the election, when they began to cover themselves. Up until then they had called Reagan too old, too stupid, too dangerous, too sleepy, and too ideological. They had said the female vote for Geraldine Ferraro would be the difference. They were lying communist scoundrels then as now.
But I'll never forget USA Today's headline the day before the election: REAGAN SEEKS 50 STATE SWEEP. He was the greatest.
Careful, fellas. This comes dangerously close to questioning Fat Teddy's patriotism."
= = = =
Really?
Did he stop by 7/11 and buy a case of patriotism? More likely he stole a gallon off his latest bimbo.
What a piece of human . . .
I can think of two off the bat that should be investigated... Jay Rockefeller(Syria) and Bill Richardson(NKorea). Of course, the one that should be hanged immediately is Kerry... for his Paris meeting with the Viet Cong.
What a piece of filth Ted Kennedy is.
Amazon.com: Reagan's War: The Epic Story of His Forty Year ...
| Amazon.com: Reagan's War: The Epic Story of His Forty Year Struggle and Final Triumph Over Communism: Books: Peter Schweizer by Peter Schweizer. in the orphan book section- pick it up. Open it near the middle, and there in Chapter and verse, are the endless details of Jimmy Carter's systematic undermining of America. Hell, I lived through that era and I had forgotten half of it. It is sickening to see how much damage he did. We are still paying on Wee Jimmy's ( like a real President, only smaller... ) "legacy," and the paying is not yet done. |
new video - fatboy and sKerry are there of course...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KJmbomyq0fc
Jay Rockefeller(Syria) and Bill Richardson(NKorea)
they have and are playing a big roll today !!!!
Ollie North is the only person I see that would, could, and will interview this author and review this book.
I hope this book will not get lost in the dust like ...
A Texan looks at Lyndon .. A STUDY IN ILLEGITIMATE POWER
by J. Evetts Haley
there is so much to absorb and read in this post
... just some that struck me ..
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Doctor Raoul #27???
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
further evidence of ...
Ted Kennedy's Ties to the KGB
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1240644/posts
post #37 by rfp1234
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
google the first 3 words certainly brings back forgotten facts
Gore-Chernomyrdin agreement, and the Clinton-Gore Administration's promise not to implement U.S. laws
google Gore-Chernomyrdin agreement and lots of info
..post #78 by Dilbert56
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
post # 80 by freedom4me
can't forget the roll Jimmy Carter played and playing
Source: Slate http://www.slate.com/id/2065887/
In November 1990, two months after Iraq's invasion of Kuwait, Carter wrote a letter to the heads of state of the permanent members of the United Nations Security Council. He urged the countries to drop their support for Bush's proposed military solution. Instead, as Douglas Brinkley outlines in The Unfinished Presidency, his glowing but not uncritical assessment of Carter's post-presidential years, Carter asked the countries to give "unequivocal support to an Arab League effort" for peace. (As Brinkley notes, Carter's anti-war position conflicted with the Carter Doctrine he had outlined as president: Any "attempt by any outside force to gain control of the Persian Gulf region will be regarded as an assault on the vital interests of the United States of America, and such force will be repelled by any means necessary, including military force.") Right up to Bush's Jan. 15 deadline for war, Carter continued his shadow foreign policy campaign. On Jan. 10, he wrote the leaders of Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and Syria and asked them to oppose the impending military action. "I am distressed by the inability of either the international community or the Arab world to find a diplomatic solution to the Gulf crisis," he wrote. "I urge you to call publicly for a delay in the use of force while Arab leaders seek a peaceful solution to the crisis. You may have to forego approval from the White House, but you will find the French, Soviets, and others fully supportive. Also, most Americans will welcome such a move." Former National Security Adviser Brent Scowcroft later accused Carter of violating the Logan Act, the law that prohibits American citizens from conducting unofficial foreign policy.
xxxxxxxxxxx
post #90 by ALOHA RONNIE
NEVER FORGET
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
post #96 Ron Dellums then and now Barbara Lee
xxxxxxxxxxxxx
great! link to the Sullentrop article at Slate...
I looked for more from him...
http://www.suellentrop.com/
but nothing was as interesting to me as the 'Jimmah rgw traitor' article...
Where are the media camping out where Kennedy lives, like they did Rove? This is a clear act of giving aid and comfort to an avowed enemy during the cold war. A G*****mn traitor is the defact head of the Democrat Party. Where are the QUESTIONS? Where is the MSM asking the real questions?.........what's that??.....what??............Silence.
Thank you.
As long as the body is left on the gibbet for a few months I don't care what you do to it.
Jimmy Carter Under Fire for Recruiting Soviets Against Reagan
Wes Vernon, NewsMax.com
Wednesday, Oct. 30, 2002
WASHINGTON Former President Jimmy Carter owes an explanation to the American people for his behavior during the Cold War, says the author of a new book.
"Reagans War reveals new information that Carter, as president and later as a private citizen, sought the help of an avowed foreign enemy of this country to undermine Reagans candidacy in 1980 and, even more shocking, tried to cripple President Reagans foreign policy in 1984.
The former Democrat president, who had been ousted by voters four years earlier, wanted the Soviets to help him put a Democrat back in the White House.
Speaking Tuesday at a seminar at the Institute of World Politics, the books author, Peter Schweizer, said Jimmy Carter owes a full explanation, and then depending on his answer, a decision could be made as to whether the former president "stepped over the line from pure dissent to giving aid and comfort to the enemy.
NewsMax.com CEO Christopher Ruddy has written that Carter "may well have committed treason by enlisting the help of the Soviet Union in the 1980 and 1984 presidential elections.
"Its a fair question for him [Carter] to give his account of what happened, and a response, which he has not done, the author told NewsMax.com. "Then, you know, depending on his reaction and response, there needs to be further discussion. The other thing potentially that perhaps ought to be asked [is] that Moscow release any files it has on the meetings.
"All we have right now, Schweizer added, "is based on these accounts by [former Soviet Ambassador] Dobrynin. And it begs the question: Is there any more material based on his [Carters] dealings with Moscow?
'Carter Won't Forget' Soviet Assistance
Schweizers book, which is going straight to the top of the best-seller list, reveals that during the 1980 campaign when Reagan was gaining in the polls, Carter "dispatched [pro-Soviet industrialist] Armand Hammer to the Soviet Embassy for a secret meeting with Ambassador Dobrynin to ask for Soviet help with Jewish emigration and other potential vote-getting issues for a sitting president. The Soviets were promised that "Carter wont forget that service if he is re-elected.
Schweizer reports that when Reagan was running for re-election in 1984, Carter himself visited Ambassador Dobrynin warning there "would not be a single agreement on arms control, especially on nuclear arms, as long as Reagan was in power.
Carter wanted the Soviet Union to help the Democrats regain the presidency. History shows his prophecy about no hope for a nuclear arms agreement to be wrong. It was a part of Reagan's success in ending the Cold War on Americas terms.
Asking Carter to explain to Americans this part of his stewardship is most "reasonable, in Schweizers view. When he asked the former president about this, all the author got was "No comment.
location: http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2002/10/29/201145.shtml
Peter Schweizer, a Hoover Institution research fellow, has just written a new book, "Reagan's War: The Epic Story of His Forty-Year Struggle and Final Triumph Over Communism."
This book may well force historians to revise the history of the Cold War.
Schweizer, after scouring once-classified KGB, East German Stasi and Soviet Communist Party files, discovered incontrovertible evidence that the Soviets not only played footsie with high-ranking Democrats, they also worked behind the scenes to influence American elections.
In "Reagan's War," Schweizer shows how the Democrats worked with Moscow to try to undermine Reagan before and after he became president.
Jimmy Carter's Dirty Tricks
Soviet diplomatic accounts and material from the archives show that in January 1984, former President Jimmy Carter dropped by Soviet Ambassador Anatoly Dobrynin's residence for a private meeting.
Carter expressed his concern about and opposition to Reagan's defense buildup. He boldly told Dobrynin that Moscow would be better off with someone else in the White House. If Reagan won, he warned, "There would not be a single agreement on arms control, especially on nuclear arms, as long as Reagan remained in power."
Using the Russians to influence the presidential election was nothing new for Carter.
Schweizer reveals Russian documents that show that in the waning days of the 1980 campaign, the Carter White House dispatched businessman Armand Hammer to the Soviet Embassy.
Hammer was a longtime Soviet-phile, and he explained to the Soviet ambassador that Carter was "clearly alarmed" at the prospect of losing to Reagan.
Hammer pleaded with the Russians for help. He asked if the Kremlin could expand Jewish emigration to bolster Carter's standing in the polls.
'Carter Won't Forget That Service'
"Carter won't forget that service if he is elected," Hammer told Dobrynin.
Carter was not the only Democrat to make clear to the Russians where their loyalty lay. As the election neared in 1984, Dobrynin recalls meetings with Speaker of the House Thomas P. "Tip" O'Neill.
O'Neill told Dobrynin that no effort should be spared to prevent "that demagogue Reagan" from being re-elected.
location:
http://www.newsmax.com/showinside.shtml?a=2002/10/16/214040
TREASON BUMP
DemonRat presidents, like Carter and Clinton, are gifts that keep on giving, just like AIDS.
Kinky, is that you?
But I agree with everything you said.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.