Skip to comments.
When Liberals Shoot Children
Townhall.com ^
| 10/22/2006
| Kevin McCullough
Posted on 10/22/2006 2:48:22 PM PDT by flynmudd
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
I agree with the author. This woman's children should be taken from her. She should be put in jail for premeditated murder.
1
posted on
10/22/2006 2:48:24 PM PDT
by
flynmudd
To: flynmudd
2
posted on
10/22/2006 2:54:58 PM PDT
by
camas
To: flynmudd
Outrageous story.
and... Townhall should get a high-octane spell-checker for their articles.
To: flynmudd
How about shooting her without the baby in her for her punishment?
To: LurkedLongEnough
LOL, even a low octane checker would have worked.
5
posted on
10/22/2006 3:03:13 PM PDT
by
ThreePuttinDude
()...Hey Libs........NO FITZMAS FOR YOU.....()
To: All
This is sick. This woman should be put away for life.
To: flynmudd
I agree with the author. This woman's children should be taken from her. She should be put in jail for premeditated murder.
''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
I disagree. She should be executed for premeditated murder.
7
posted on
10/22/2006 3:05:06 PM PDT
by
photodawg
To: flynmudd
This is really f***** up. I'm far from a legal expert on this, but is this a now a 'legal precedent'?
8
posted on
10/22/2006 3:23:31 PM PDT
by
kinoxi
To: kinoxi
Unfortunately I think it does set precedent.
9
posted on
10/22/2006 3:26:02 PM PDT
by
flynmudd
(Proud Navy Mom to OSSR Richard T. Blalock-DDG 61)
To: flynmudd
10
posted on
10/22/2006 3:27:15 PM PDT
by
proudmilitarymrs
(It's not immigration, it's an invasion!)
To: flynmudd
"She should be put in jail for premeditated murder."
For the rest of her natural life.
11
posted on
10/22/2006 3:29:27 PM PDT
by
BLS
(If you were blind you wouldn't be guilty, but you are guilty because you claim you can see)
To: flynmudd; camas
I agree with you both. I think this is a miscarriage of justice. She belongs in jail and never should be able to have anymore children or the ones she has. If her boyfriend had shot her he would be in jail for murder but because she did it it was ok? I think the judge ought to be ashamed of himself. This is not justice for this unborn child.
12
posted on
10/22/2006 3:30:27 PM PDT
by
pandoraou812
( barbaric with zero tolerance and dilligaf?)
To: ConservativeMind
Empty the clip....just to be sure.
13
posted on
10/22/2006 3:34:08 PM PDT
by
RasterMaster
(Winning Islamic hearts and minds.........one bullet at a time!)
To: kinoxi
While I guess a couple of judges have decided that "anyone" does not mean "anyone", it does seem to me that it could be fixed up be the legislature in the next session. It does make for ridiculous law writing if you have to start saying "anyone not excepting so-and-so or such and such a class of person and most definitely including whatchamacallit," and that's what the judges involved have done.
14
posted on
10/22/2006 3:40:21 PM PDT
by
Mad Dawg
(Now we are all Massoud)
To: Mad Dawg
Skinner's liberal, pro-abort lawyer used the Clintonian tactic to argue the meaning of "any person" and defended his client by saying the word meant "any one other than" Skinner.
So any law with the phrase 'any person' can be argued and appealed due to this cr**. How do these sick individuals attain such potions to begin with?
15
posted on
10/22/2006 3:44:33 PM PDT
by
kinoxi
To: kinoxi
potions = positions
Typing with frustration.
16
posted on
10/22/2006 3:46:52 PM PDT
by
kinoxi
To: camas
"and her tubes cut."
Stand her on her head and pack her full of cement. That will keep her from getting pregnant again.
17
posted on
10/22/2006 3:47:46 PM PDT
by
Beagle8U
(Demonrats want the Gays out of Congress.....stand back and let them purge their base.)
To: kinoxi
"How do these sick individuals attain such potions to begin with?"
By RATS getting elected to appoint them?
18
posted on
10/22/2006 3:52:05 PM PDT
by
Beagle8U
(Demonrats want the Gays out of Congress.....stand back and let them purge their base.)
To: Beagle8U
By RATS getting elected to appoint them?
Good argument to get out and vote.
19
posted on
10/22/2006 3:53:32 PM PDT
by
kinoxi
To: ThreePuttinDude
"LOL, even a low octane checker would have worked."
It *is* distracting, isn't it?
This is just one more example of the liberal inability to draw the line anywhere. Falling down stairs? Gain/lose weight? How the heck they can equate shooting yourself while going into labor with those scenarios is beyond me.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson