[Sisku Hanne]

"Larger, more mainstream police unions sharply disagree that the suburban unrest has any religious basis."
Let me see if I got this straight: Thousands of muslim attacks on police and other emergency personnel, including laying ambushes for them = no religious basis. Four muslim guys jumped at a London mosque = instantaneous classification as religious-based "hate crime".

Eurabia, we hardly knew ye.

[headstamp]

"Larger, more mainstream police unions sharply disagree that the suburban unrest has any religious basis."


Because they are absolutely terrified to think about it actually being true.

[ValerieUSA]

Larger, more mainstream police unions sharply disagree that the suburban unrest has any religious basis. However, they do say that some youth gangs no longer seem content to throw stones or torch cars and instead appear determined to hurt police officers — or worse.
"First, it was a rock here or there. Then it was rocks by the dozen. Now, they're leading operations of an almost military sort to trap us," said Loic Lecouplier, a police union official in the Seine-Saint-Denis region north of Paris. "These are acts of war."

The first step in reality therapy for these dopes in denial is to identify and name the "they" of which Lecouplier speaks. Name them ... by individual monikers and by the groups they belong to. You will see how silly it is to deny the religious jihad in your country.