Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Suckers.

Too bad, that would have been a nice item.

1 posted on 10/22/2006 5:38:15 PM PDT by FLOutdoorsman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: FLOutdoorsman
Even one quick glance should have shown it
to be an obvious fake:


2 posted on 10/22/2006 5:40:22 PM PDT by Petronski (CNN is an insidiously treasonous, enemy propaganda organ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FLOutdoorsman

3 posted on 10/22/2006 5:45:14 PM PDT by bnelson44 (Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FLOutdoorsman

This sounds like a classic case of buyer's remorse. The guy paid way more than it was really worth even if authentic, realized it, and is trying to get his money back.

In any event, the buyer should have examined the items and done the needed research before the sale. If he had any doubts about the authenticity, he should not have bid.

It's not always the seller or auctioneer that is the crook.


5 posted on 10/22/2006 6:15:54 PM PDT by Fresh Wind (Democrats are guilty of whatever they scream the loudest about.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FLOutdoorsman

If the item is from that time, and there is no record of it one way or the other but TE tended to give out such items, I think that finding "proof" that it's a forgery will be very, very difficult. It will be like proving the existence of a nullity, proof that something (flying horses? aliens from Neptune?) can't exist. The seller has every reason to be confident.


8 posted on 10/22/2006 8:33:53 PM PDT by KellyAdmirer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson