[finnman69]

Cindy please go away. We don't want be made nauseous hearing about how you banged Lew Rockwell.

[Grendel9]

Only the dimwitted don't realize that
George Soros' lawyers are backing Ma
Sheehan because her publicity 35 minutes
have not only passed, but very few people
even care any more.
Secondly, such a publication of all tangible
evidence re her activities will hamper
her own future book which will be ghost-
written by some liberal author. If you've
ever listened to this crude woman speak, you
have to cede the fact that her language,
sentence structure, et al. simply do NOT
measure up to the printed word!

[HarleyLady27]

She-hag must be out of money....

[Polyxene]

"But, if the documents are subpoenaed, we will have no choice but to act in accordance with the court's requests, therefore making the documents public."

AH, the legal discovery process! It's a beautiful thing! You might get more than you asked for, She-HAG.

[fhlh]

I guess the 'unvarnished truth' only applies when it shows our soliders being killed...

[bigbob]

Hope she sues, the authors will then bring forth all the dirty laundry to further discredit this lousy POS woman.

[Hildy]

These people are using our tragedy for profit," she charged. "They always accuse me of exploiting Casey's death for profit, and what are they doing?"

FUNNIEST thing I've read in a long time.

[OldFriend]

CNN didn't need any threats to censor the book. CNN has a vested interest in keeping the ditch witch pure as the driven snow.

Frankly, I wish that all people of honor and integrity would refuse to go on CNN.

[ssaftler]

Makes me wonder why Glenn didn't have Melanie Morgan on his RADIO show, which is not controlled by the Communist News Network. I'm sure he could have had a much more "informative" discussion of the book without the MSM censors.

[mjp]

Cindy Sheehan:
histrionic personality disorder:
notice me!
notice me!
notice me!

[Nathan Zachary]

Sheeman is being her usual  hypocrite self, and CNN of course is the typical leftist moonbat hypocrite supporter.

Who ever heard of  MSM NOT airing something because it may or may not be truthful and personal? What a joke.

 

This should be a reminder to all just what kind of "free speech"  the left supports. Free speech to Leftist moonbat RATS means only they can speak freely about anyone or anything. Any opposing views shall be censored.

[Roberts]

I'm guessing that Cindy doesn't have the guts to follow through. She'll come up with some excuse as to how difficult it is to prove libel (which is NOT true if there is no factual basis for the allegations of that nature).

[pandoraou812]

I can imagine Cindy sitting there chatting away in the porno type chat rooms making dates. But can you imagine the face of the guy or girl she finally meets face to face? lol. I think her best match would be Prince Charles, they both look alike.

[Nathan Zachary]

 

Sheehan stated during the interview that her anger was based on several statements in the book, including a claim that after her son's death, "Cindy had become addicted to online chat rooms of a pornographic nature."

YUUCKK!!!!!!  WHAT A HORRIBLE THOUGHT!!

I guess every pervert out there who participates in these chat rooms must feel very sick knowing that they may have had cyber sex with  ugly.

The book also asserts that Sheehan exchanged "hundreds of explicit emails and instant messages" with a married man.

I imagine his wife is having a lot of fun with this. She'll probably tease him every day for the rest of his life reminding him that he cybered with one of the ugliest things on the planet. Eewww!

Sheehan in the radio interview called Moy and Morgan "hate-mongers" engaged in "yellow journalism."

I don't see any "Hate  mongering" there, just fact based on the truth. Typical moonbat defense line. If you don't have any evidence to the contrary, call your opponent names. 

 

[Laissez-faire capitalist]

It is ok for Cindy Sheehan to bash Bush, but a book that is written about her, in her own words, is "hate-mongering."

Go figure.

She could easily be called a hate-mongerer herself.

[longtermmemmory]

I sheehan sues and if sheehan uses AOL then every sincle email she sent is archived.

Sheehan SHOULD sue so discovery will set her free.

[CaptRon]

. "But, if the documents are subpoenaed, we will have no choice but to act in accordance with the court's requests, therefore making the documents public."

Discovery. It's a beautiful thing.

[MEGoody]

Well, if the author has evidence of the claims in the book, no problem. But if these claims are spurious, no matter how much I dislike "Ms" Sheehan, I'd want her to sue and win.

I hope the author has all kinds of evidence.

[Kenton]

I wonder what the basis of her case will be? In order to sue somebody for slander or libel, she has a very high standard of proof to fulfill, because she is no longer a "private person", she has become a publicity whore and is therefore fair game.

If she was just the average suburban housewife and somebody went out and slandered her, she'd only have to prove that she suffered damage to her reputation as the result.

As a "public person", anybody can say just about anything they want about her, and she has to prove that not only was it not true, but that they knew it was not true and that they did so with malice aforethought.