Replies

Under ordinary circumstances, such citations should be from established scientific organizations, but--as you ALREADY KNOW--those organizations are hardly unbiased. Why would they acknowledge that support for their current religious explanation of origins is waning? Creationism is popping up all over the news, with polls of people who support Creationism in large numbers. If the average Joe is increasingly skeptical of Macroevolutionism, surely it is logical that an increasing amount of scientists would be, too?

100 posted on 10/24/2006 8:25:34 PM PDT by Jedi Master Pikachu ( The r/l thing is Japanese, not pan-Asian, and, in any case, making a mockery of it is rude.)

Creationism is popping up all over the news, with polls of people who support Creationism in large numbers. If the average Joe is increasingly skeptical of Macroevolutionism, surely it is logical that an increasing amount of scientists would be, too?

Sorry, that happens not to be the case.

106 posted on 10/24/2006 8:59:18 PM PDT by Coyoteman (I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)