Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RobFromGa
The Fox ad seemed to be a McCaskill ad for Senate, this one appears to be an ad against the Amendment 2. What does the Senate race (a national position) have to do with the amendment? Why did Fox attack a Senate candidate who has only one vote on this amendment like any other MO citizen.

First of all the ad ran only in Missouri, not nationally. What does the senate race have to do with the ammendment? Talent is on one side of the issue (after flipflopping) and McCaskill is on the other.

I would imagine Fox is supporting McCaskill because he wants people like McCaskill and Hardin who he also did an ad for to make it to the senate so they will support stem cell research nationally.

42 posted on 10/24/2006 3:06:01 PM PDT by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: Dave S
What do you have in this amendment passing?

The Fox ad was a twisted perversion of what the amendment is allllll about.
108 posted on 10/24/2006 4:16:12 PM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson