[Dimensio]

Think about it. All of these have been proposed on this one thread: 1) If there are changes, that must mean evolution. 2) If there are no changes, that must mean evolution. 3) If this branch didn't change, others must have, so that must mean evolution.

You have not accurately portrayed the explanations and responses given on this discussion.

[HeadOn]

"You have not accurately portrayed the explanations and responses given on this discussion."

I believe I have. Despite being a Bible-believing Creationist, I do indeed have a normal IQ, perhaps even above average. I also have a talent for understanding even the most convoluted communications and stating (accurately) the bottom line.

Your colleagues have already confirmed some of my claims in their replies, allowing that these discoveries are indeed placed into a template which pre-supposes evolution as fact.