To: L98Fiero
The prosecution should be under no burden to prove that every defendant that comes to court isn't retarded.
That's a determination for the jury to make, not the black robes. If a defendant who is mentally competent claims he is retarded, I trust the common man sitting on the jury far more than the black robes to make the determination as to the defendant's honesty. The method of defense a defendant uses is not subject to state approval. Ever. That would be like the US using only methods of fighting wars that her enemies deem appropriate, or only building a wall on the southern border if Mexico approves it. Oh wait...
14 posted on
10/26/2006 1:35:17 PM PDT by
JamesP81
(Rights must be enforced; rights that you're not allowed to enforce are rights that you don't have.)
To: JamesP81
"That's a determination for the jury to make, not the black robes."
Exactly. First sentence in the article.
15 posted on
10/26/2006 1:40:39 PM PDT by
L98Fiero
(Evil is an exact science)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson